 |
Mega-churches VS the IRS |
 |

06-22-2012, 06:34 AM
|
 |
stressed broke pizza guy
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,215
|
|
Mega-churches VS the IRS
so it seems that some (and it seems that number have been increasing in the last decade) chruches, mega-chruches and the Catholic churchs are openlyh challanging the IRS. They are doing this by open, overt and sometimes over the top very politicized sermons even goinjg so far as to tell people who to vote for.
Now according to the IRS rules of charitable/relgioujs organizations, that organization can not be overt in reguards to politics. if they go full blown political they are in jeporady of losing their tax-exempt status. But it seems the IRS is not really doing anything to either shut this down or come up with some reasonable rules.
http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_new...o-far#comments
__________________
I'm lost without a paddle and I'm headed up sh*t creek.
I got one foot on a banana peel and the other in the Twilight Zone.
The Fools - Life Sucks Then You Die
|

06-22-2012, 08:10 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,228
|
|
The government has no obligation to give them a tax break in the first place. It offers them one if they stick to some fairly basic rules. Break the rules, get a warning. Keep breaking the rules, lose your privilege.
Tax 'em.
|

06-22-2012, 10:05 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 142
|
|
I never understood why churches receive tax exemption, but then again I was the little girl in Sunday school telling the other kids Jesus and God are just lies parents tell their kids to make them be good...
|

06-22-2012, 08:10 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 392
|
|
Religious institutions receive tax exemptions because they do a lot of charity work as organizations, and a lot of their income usually goes towards that. It's true that not all churches do a lot of charity work, but whatever you may think of them or their politics, most of them do. And, as has been mentioned, there are rules in place to govern how they keep their tax exempt status. They just need to be enforced.
Last edited by Jaden; 06-23-2012 at 12:07 AM.
|

06-22-2012, 11:33 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,426
|
|
It definitely needs to be scrutinized more closely. Or, better yet, ask churches to separate their charity work (tax exempt) and evangelical work (not tax exempt). Hell, can you imagine the boost to the economy from property taxes alone?
|

06-23-2012, 03:32 AM
|
 |
Some balding guy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,715
|
|
Don't forget the howls of outrage.
Rapscallion
__________________
Proud to be a W.A.N.K.E.R. - Womanless And No Kids - Exciting Rubbing!
Reclaiming words is fun!
|

06-23-2012, 08:01 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,191
|
|
Is there some distinction made between non-profit organizations that are churches and all others? Should those other organizations (many museums, for example) also lose their tax exemptions across the board, or only if they wander outside the rules?
__________________
"My in-laws are country people and at night you can hear their distinctive howl."
|

06-23-2012, 08:52 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 677
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HYHYBT
Is there some distinction made between non-profit organizations that are churches and all others? Should those other organizations (many museums, for example) also lose their tax exemptions across the board, or only if they wander outside the rules?
|
Only if they wander outside the rules.
|

06-23-2012, 10:35 PM
|
 |
Accepting of Differences
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: sou Cali
Posts: 7,477
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HYHYBT
Is there some distinction made between non-profit organizations that are churches and all others?
|
There are some distinctions.
The most notable is that charities have to have their financials public, as regards their statements while churches are not so required.
^-.-^
__________________
Faith is about what you do. It's about aspiring to be better and nobler and kinder than you are. It's about making sacrifices for the good of others. - Dresden
|
 |
|
 |

06-28-2012, 01:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
|
|
Churches were completely free to preach about candidates from the day that the Constitution was ratified in 1788 until 1954. That’s when the rule known as the ‘Johnson Amendment’ was enacted. Churches are exempt from taxation under the principle that there is no surer way to destroy religion than to begin taxing it. As the U.S. Supreme Court has noted, the power to tax involves the power to destroy. The real effect of the Johnson Amendment is that pastors are muzzled for fear of investigation by the IRS.
In 1954, Johnson was facing re-election to the Senate and was being aggressively opposed by two non-profit anti-Communist groups that were attacking Johnson’s liberal agenda. In retaliation, Johnson inserted language into the IRS code that prohibited non-profits, including churches, from endorsing or opposing candidates for political office. In effect, Senator Johnson used the power of the go-along Congress and the IRS to silence his opposition. Unfortunately, it worked. Some in Johnson’s staff claimed that Johnson never intended to go after churches, only the two “nonprofits” in Texas. Nevertheless, his sly amendment to the tax code affected every church in America, and it is a violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
The First Amendment clearly states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech....
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:19 PM.
|
|
|