Originally posted by Amanita
View Post
In the atheist example, I would say that if person A asked person B which church they attended and was told that B was an atheist, and it left at that, then I'd find that reasonable. If A didn't understand and asked what that meant, I'd have no issue with an explanation. To take it further, I would expect some sort of request for permission from one side or the other to ask if the other person wanted to discuss it further.
Where it would come unreasonable for me would be if the atheist were to say that they didn't go to church for reason X, Y, or Z, and that anyone who did was a fool, or if the religious person started witnessing there and then.
On a legal note, under the US system you can say what you want and not be circumscribed by the government. Private institutions are able to operate under their own rules. However, it's more the rules of decent society that dictate what's reasonable.
In the UK, we have an automatic ability to exercise free speech barring a few things you don't want (inciting racial hatred etc). We even have an area of London called Speaker's Corner, which is more an area of a park where people get on soap boxes (used to be literally) and tell people why they're wankers.
That's what I'd call reasonable. Just asking if someone wants to debate is fine in my opinion. If not, then as long as their actions don't harm someone else then I can't see the problem with it - live and let live.
Rapscallion
Comment