Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
science finds a way!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hobbs View PostIf you read my previous posts, which I can see you haven't, I stated that there is no reason, in my opinion as a member of the faithful, for the device-whatever-not to be used.Last edited by Rebel; 05-31-2010, 10:55 PM."Having a Christian threaten me with hell is like having a hippy threaten to punch me in my aura."
Josh Thomas
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hobbs View PostI'm not familiar with any Church policy to refuse blood transfusion or blood testing. If there is, please cite it. If not, it's more uneducated rhetoric.
Originally posted by Hobbs View Post
Same article- In a 2003 Vatican document titled Family Values Versus Safe Sex, the use of condoms in HIV-prevention programs was forcefully rejected:
so as I said DOCTRINE HASN'T CHANGED-a few people going against doctrine doesn't change it it just means that oops they are now heretics-and remember you yourself in this thread said:
Originally posted by Hobbs View PostDoctrine is more important than any petty human judgement.
The Catholic bishops of South Africa, Botswana, and Swaziland categorically regard the widespread and indiscriminate promotion of condoms as an immoral and misguided weapon in our battle against HIV/AIDS for the following reasons. The use of condoms goes against human dignity. Condoms change the beautiful act of love into a selfish search for pleasure-while rejecting responsibility. Condoms do not guarantee protection against HIV/AIDS. Condoms may even be one of the main reasons for the spread of HIV/AIDS.
and the statement by Cardinal Alfonso Lopez Trujillo-is the most ignorant of science I have ever read.
and actually the BBC, UN, and WHO have all gone against him and his ignorance that he continues to spread.
The Catholic Church has been accused of telling people in countries with high rates of HIV that condoms do not protect against the deadly virus.
Originally posted by BBCThe cardinal(Alfonso Lopez Trujillo), who is president of the Vatican's Pontifical Council for the Family, suggests that governments should urge people not to use condoms.
The Archbishop of Nairobi Raphael Ndingi Nzeki told Panaroma that condoms were helping to spread the virus.
Gordon Wambi, director of an Aids testing programme in Lwak, near Lake Victoria, told the programme that he could not distribute condoms because of opposition from the Catholic Church.
"Some priests have even been saying that condoms are laced with HIV/Aids," he said.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hobbs View PostYou can't just call something "murder" because you don't agree with it
And I mean "you people" as people who use any excuse to attack Holy Mother Church.
Added a link in there that you reminded me of.
RapscallionProud to be a W.A.N.K.E.R. - Womanless And No Kids - Exciting Rubbing!
Reclaiming words is fun!
Comment
-
From trojancondoms.com
If used properly, latex condoms will help to reduce the risk of transmission of HIV infection (AIDS) and many other sexually transmitted diseases.
Clinical trials have shown that correct and consistent use of latex condoms results in contraceptive efficacy rates of 95-98%.
Plus, other clinical studies confirm that high quality latex condoms - when used correctly and consistently - are a very effective barrier to the transmission of HIV, other sexually transmitted infections and also unplanned pregnancy.
If used properly, a condom is very effective at reducing the risk of being infected with HIV during sexual intercourse. Using a condom also provides protection against other sexually transmitted diseases, and protection against pregnancy. In the laboratory, latex condoms are very effective at blocking transmission of HIV because the pores in latex condoms are too small to allow the virus to pass through. However, outside of the laboratory condoms are less effective because people do not always use condoms properly.
As for the rapist argument, please tell me how often a rapist will take the time to use a condom. Some might be smart enough to do it to prevent any DNA evidence being left behind, but I doubt it's very common in comparison to the number of rape cases out there. I remember years ago there was a woman that was raped that almost lost her case because she asked her attacked to wear one. They argued that it then became consensual. If I remember right, it ended in a mistrial.
If this ring or the film does what they claim to do without hindering conception, than the Church should have no arguments with it.
CHSome People Are Alive Only Because It's Illegal To Kill Them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hobbs View PostAnd I mean "you people" as people who use any excuse to attack Holy Mother Church.
Originally posted by Hobbs View PostThey're protectors of the Church, charged with protecting it from freaks and the enemies of the Church. I much prefer the version shown in Crossfire over the version seen in Hellsing, since the people fought in Crossfire rightfully should be fought (they're terrorists).
Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to war, and my fingers to fight.
"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
...Stephen F Roberts
Originally posted by crashhelmet View PostAs for the rapist argument, please tell me how often a rapist will take the time to use a condom.
Woman's husband goes to prison-contracts HIV, comes home and passes it on-it's reportedly(sources are questionable) used as a "punishment" in some South African prisons-have an HIV positive inmate rape a non-cooperative inmate-but that's another argument all together.....Last edited by BlaqueKatt; 06-01-2010, 01:45 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlaqueKatt View Postyou certainly have no issues with attacking other religions-for example say Islam.....why is your religion so much more sacred than theirs? Because it's yours? Because it the "one true religion"? Newsflash-all religions believe theirs is the one true religion-Catholicism/Christianity does not have a monopoly on that. and didn't you condemn followers of Islam for some of them threatening death on "innocent people"-yet for the sake of your religion it's ok?
Do my spidey senses sense hypocrisy?
"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
...Stephen F Roberts
Why is it hypocritical to defend yourself against enemies? The Vatican is a sovereign state, and as such, has as much right to self-defense as any other nation of the world.
Comment
-
And I'm sure telling a rapist you are abstaining from sex will stop them
Yes, because we all know that abstinence is so effective.
Sex is natural.
Marriage and monogamy and abstinence are man-made.
Abstinence-only education has surpassed "inadequate". It's surpassed "irresponsible". I'd now call it "cruel"."My in-laws are country people and at night you can hear their distinctive howl."
Comment
-
Okay. So now the sex part of HIV/AIDS is covered. When I say the sex part, I mean responsible people who are consenting and actually think about it.
Now, onto the other ways HIV/AIDS can be contracted."It's after Jeopardy, so it is my bed time."- Me when someone made a joke about how "old" I am.
Comment
-
As for the rapist argument, please tell me how often a rapist will take the time to use a condom. Some might be smart enough to do it to prevent any DNA evidence being left behind, but I doubt it's very common in comparison to the number of rape cases out there. I remember years ago there was a woman that was raped that almost lost her case because she asked her attacked to wear one. They argued that it then became consensual. If I remember right, it ended in a mistrial.
I've heard it is believed in parts of Africa that having sex with a virgin cures aids. So a man has unprotected sex, gets aids, and then goes around raping virgins/ spreading his aids.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlaqueKatt View PostAnd I'm sure telling a rapist you are abstaining from sex will stop them
That's kind of an illogical argument to the topic that was being discussed, which, I believe, was the wearing of condoms being forbidden by the church.Point to Ponder:
Is it considered irony when someone on an internet forum makes a post that can be considered to look like it was written by a 3rd grade dropout, and they are poking fun of the fact that another person couldn't spell?
Comment
Comment