So I'm shocked no one here has posted anything about the now-infamous "Shirtgate". Incredibly stupid name aside, I wanted to see what you thought about this issue.
If anyone doesn't know what this is about, here is an article about it. Long story short, one of the ESA scientists (Matt Taylor) instrumental in the Rosetta/Philae landing went on TV wearing a bowling shirt covered in half-naked women posed in sexually suggestive ways. The internet went bananas.
The argument comes down to two sides:
1 - This shirt is an excellent representation of the silent, unconscious sexism of the STEM professions. Most don't believe Mr. Taylor wore the shirt to be deliberately inflammatory, but it highlights a culture of men not having to think about how their clothing will represent them OR their fields of work. Women watching the broadcast may see it as a sign that they are not welcome in the STEM lines of employment.
2 - Mr. Taylor was free to wear any shirt he wanted, and it's silly that anyone is freaking out about it. Worse than that, the feminists complaining about his shirt choice are being hypocritical, as there have been many, many rallies and public displays about how women do not want to be judged by the clothes that they wear. This whole thing was blown out of proportion by the media and everyone should STFU and focus on the awesome science behind the comet landing.
I've tried to be objective in describing both sides of the argument, but I fear my bias may have shown through - I'm pretty sure you can tell which one I'm on.
What are your thoughts?
If anyone doesn't know what this is about, here is an article about it. Long story short, one of the ESA scientists (Matt Taylor) instrumental in the Rosetta/Philae landing went on TV wearing a bowling shirt covered in half-naked women posed in sexually suggestive ways. The internet went bananas.
The argument comes down to two sides:
1 - This shirt is an excellent representation of the silent, unconscious sexism of the STEM professions. Most don't believe Mr. Taylor wore the shirt to be deliberately inflammatory, but it highlights a culture of men not having to think about how their clothing will represent them OR their fields of work. Women watching the broadcast may see it as a sign that they are not welcome in the STEM lines of employment.
2 - Mr. Taylor was free to wear any shirt he wanted, and it's silly that anyone is freaking out about it. Worse than that, the feminists complaining about his shirt choice are being hypocritical, as there have been many, many rallies and public displays about how women do not want to be judged by the clothes that they wear. This whole thing was blown out of proportion by the media and everyone should STFU and focus on the awesome science behind the comet landing.
I've tried to be objective in describing both sides of the argument, but I fear my bias may have shown through - I'm pretty sure you can tell which one I'm on.
What are your thoughts?
Comment