Originally posted by Lace Neil Singer
View Post
Longer explanation: one key component to those who insist that there was at the very least a second gunman in addition to Oswald is that, between what the Zapruder film clearly shows regarding the timing of the shots, and what an expert gunman was able to do with the gun that Oswald wielded, it was demonstrated that even a professional shooter could not get off those three shots in that amount of time, especially (if I remember correctly) the last two.
Also: physics.
Longer explanation: Governor Connally's wounds are inconsistent with Oswald being the lone shooter. To wit: Oswald fired three shots. One is a known miss. One was the kills shot to the head. And the third, if Oswald acted alone, went through Kennedy's neck, and caused seven separate wounds in Connally that simply do not line up with the way the Governor was sitting OR ballistics reality (nine separate wounds in two men with nary a defomration of the alleged bullet).
We can examine some other details, but these two things are the keystones upon which most conspiracy theories are built, and why many people who don't consider themselves conspiracy theorists per se just don't buy that there was only one gunman, Oswald or otherwise.
Hope that was concise.
Comment