This is an offshoot of the other illegal immigration thread, which seems to be purely about illegal immigration as it applies to the USA.
I have some aspects of illegal immigration I'd like to talk about, which would get totally lost in the other thread, and figured some other non-US folks might have too.
So. Illegal immigration issues in Aussieland:
(Almost alliterative!)
Australia has a problem: we're a large land mass, but a very small amount of that land mass is suitable for dense human living, and we have severe limits on the amount of fresh water available. This produces strict limits on the population we can realistically support.
We currently have circa 20 million humans living on the continent. Our infrastructure supports about that, and ecologists have estimated our sustainable population at a reasonable quality of life (see the 'poverty' thread I started - reasonable is a bit above poverty as I define it) as between 10 million and 30 million, depending on which ecologist you talk to, and what their precise definition of 'reasonable quality of life' is.
Because of the limits on human population in Australia, and the limits of our infrastructure, we can't randomly absorb a million people here, another million there, whenever there's a war or a disaster. We try to control our immigration, to try to balance normal immigration, normal childbirth rates, and giving sanctuary to refugees.
Obviously, illegal immigration, 'queue-jumping' refugees, and surges in childbirth rates mess up this balancing act. That's Aussieland's biggest problem (as I see it) with any form of illegal immigration.
(We also often get pressure from the UN to take more refugees than we can actually absorb. People who see 'first world nation' and 'large land mass', not 'desert'.)
I have some aspects of illegal immigration I'd like to talk about, which would get totally lost in the other thread, and figured some other non-US folks might have too.
So. Illegal immigration issues in Aussieland:
(Almost alliterative!)
Australia has a problem: we're a large land mass, but a very small amount of that land mass is suitable for dense human living, and we have severe limits on the amount of fresh water available. This produces strict limits on the population we can realistically support.
We currently have circa 20 million humans living on the continent. Our infrastructure supports about that, and ecologists have estimated our sustainable population at a reasonable quality of life (see the 'poverty' thread I started - reasonable is a bit above poverty as I define it) as between 10 million and 30 million, depending on which ecologist you talk to, and what their precise definition of 'reasonable quality of life' is.
Because of the limits on human population in Australia, and the limits of our infrastructure, we can't randomly absorb a million people here, another million there, whenever there's a war or a disaster. We try to control our immigration, to try to balance normal immigration, normal childbirth rates, and giving sanctuary to refugees.
Obviously, illegal immigration, 'queue-jumping' refugees, and surges in childbirth rates mess up this balancing act. That's Aussieland's biggest problem (as I see it) with any form of illegal immigration.
(We also often get pressure from the UN to take more refugees than we can actually absorb. People who see 'first world nation' and 'large land mass', not 'desert'.)
Comment