Given the thread on Obama's award and the general thoughts expressed there, do people still think it has much value?
And let's extend the thought pattern here... what about some other prestigious prize, award or reward. If someone receives it whom is very .. 'controversial' (for want of a better word) and does not appear to be truly deserving, does that negate the value of it for all time?
I recall many years ago, the first (and only) Grammy Award for Best Hard Rock/Metal Performance Vocal or Instrumental was given to Jethro Tull (whom I've been a fan of for years - and is not metal or hard rock), over Metallica and Alice Cooper (who, decidedly, are metal/hard rock). That damaged the Grammy's for some for a while.. now?
And let's extend the thought pattern here... what about some other prestigious prize, award or reward. If someone receives it whom is very .. 'controversial' (for want of a better word) and does not appear to be truly deserving, does that negate the value of it for all time?
I recall many years ago, the first (and only) Grammy Award for Best Hard Rock/Metal Performance Vocal or Instrumental was given to Jethro Tull (whom I've been a fan of for years - and is not metal or hard rock), over Metallica and Alice Cooper (who, decidedly, are metal/hard rock). That damaged the Grammy's for some for a while.. now?
Comment