Problem being that the direct 'vote for or against taxes' system doesn't really work either. Whenever it's been tried, no one really ever voted for taxes and the administration in question was incapable of doing anything. What we need is a happy medium whereby government can get what it needs to do what it does but people have a say in the matter...
If only we could think of some such system... /sarcasm
In all seriousness though, I think we can tackle this 'not enough say' stuff if 1) more people were genuinely interested and active in their local and federal government and 2) better avenues of discussion opened up between constituents and politicians.
I fancy the idea of a monthly or even weekly chat day. Where, for a few hours, a politician either sits down with or over the phone/ and IM talks one-on-one with interested constituents. It happens to an extent in some areas, but IMO it should be standard practice.
All of that aside, the Tea Party isn't against taxation without representation, rather taxation in general. They're also not against authoritarianism at large, just liberal authoritarianism.
If only we could think of some such system... /sarcasm
In all seriousness though, I think we can tackle this 'not enough say' stuff if 1) more people were genuinely interested and active in their local and federal government and 2) better avenues of discussion opened up between constituents and politicians.
I fancy the idea of a monthly or even weekly chat day. Where, for a few hours, a politician either sits down with or over the phone/ and IM talks one-on-one with interested constituents. It happens to an extent in some areas, but IMO it should be standard practice.
All of that aside, the Tea Party isn't against taxation without representation, rather taxation in general. They're also not against authoritarianism at large, just liberal authoritarianism.
Comment