Originally posted by Fuzzykitten99
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Communism and Why It's Bad
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Greenday View PostAmerica was built on the idea of equal and fairness. Communism is actually making everything equal and fair for everyone. I mean, capitalism rewards the rich and screws over everyone else. And no one finds this evil apparently?
Communism - both pure Marx and Marxist-Leninism Communism - relies on one thing to make it work: That everyone has the best interests of everyone else at heart.
That's the only flaw. No, really - that's it. It relies on you having the best interests of your fellow humans at heart. Essentially, it requires everyone to be idealistic.
Now, take a look at the people around us IRL and let that sink in.
Your boss - he totally has your best interest in mind, right?
Your political leader?
The neighbor across the way?
Etc?
Unofrtunately, a political system based on idealism hitches up. So do economic systems based on idealism. They forget that we, as humanity, are regularly selfish little bastards.
As for capitalism, it works the other way around. It's based on you being a selfish bastard. Thus, it tends to work fairly well.
Comment
-
"In every language, the first word after "Mama!" that every kid learns to say
is "Mine!" A system that doesn't allow ownership, that doesn't allow you to
say "Mine!" when you grow up, has -- to put it mildly -- a fatal design flaw."
"Communism doesn't work because people like to own stuff."
Frank Zappa."You're miserable, edgy and tired. You're in the perfect mood for journalism."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fuzzykitten99 View PostCommunism stifles innovation because it means government has total control over all resources. When government has total control over all resources, they must ration them.
When the first Trabants came out in the 1960s, they were simply a way to get the Bloc mobile. As such, they were pretty crude and basic. Three-cylinder, two-stroke engine, etc. (I should mention here that the Trabant's emissions were pretty bad. This wasn't the fault of the design, but that of the owners. For those who don't know, a two-stroke requires oil added into the gasoline. At the time, it was common belief that if they added twice as much...it would last twice as long. Sadly, all it did was spew out pollution.) Anyway, what happened with the Trabant, is that even though they sold well...the company never made any money on them, but there was never any left over to develop the product.
Why was there never any money? Simple--it all went back to the government, who divided it up to various other enterprises, including a fair chunk back into the higher-ups in the Communist party. (Kinda ironic when you think about it--structurally, it was almost *exactly* like capitalism. That is, a few well-off people at the top, and a huge "middle class" below them....) Money, along with all resources were rationed by the government. That eventually caused shortages, and multiple-year-long waiting lists, simply because the government couldn't move fast enough to prevent them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ArenaBoy View Post"In every language, the first word after "Mama!" that every kid learns to say
is "Mine!" A system that doesn't allow ownership, that doesn't allow you to
say "Mine!" when you grow up, has -- to put it mildly -- a fatal design flaw."
"Communism doesn't work because people like to own stuff."
Frank Zappa.
Anyway - a bit more on track... humans are the way they are because that's the way they've been brought up. (take abused kids as an example - why do so many turn into the abuser later in life? Because that's what's 'normal').
You bring someone up in a utopian way, they're far more likely to develop utopian ethics - presuming they don't have 'interference' from other cultures/societies.
So - communism will work well - when people don't get the idea of ownership and screwing other people over. And the country can make it happen..
Russia and China's problems with 'communism' was also the massive amount of people to look after across a massive amount of country - and without either the infrastructure or primary industries to deliver. That's why either England or France would have been his designated targets - they have a smaller population, a good enough infrastructure, across a smaller land base with fairly good rural pastures. And, at the time, had a ruling class walking over the workers (just for the added bonus of revolution )
So.. my boss might not have my best interests at heart, but neither does anyone else in this day and age... that's the culture that I've been brought up in.
Those 'undesireable' jobs are only 'undesirable' because we put jobs into a heirarchy... when it comes down to only doing about 4 hours a day helping out society, and spending the rest of the time pursuing our own passions, that won't be a problem (I mean - just think of yourself now... if you could do just 4 hours working at a job you hate, but get everything you need to pursue that which you dearly love - wouldn't you do it??)
SlytZOE: Preacher, don't the Bible got some pretty specific things to say about killing?
SHEPHERD BOOK: Quite specific. It is, however, Somewhat fuzzier on the subject of kneecaps.
Comment
Comment