Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

House GOP Proposes So-Called ‘Let Women Die’ Bill That Lets Hospitals Deny Life-Savin

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • House GOP Proposes So-Called ‘Let Women Die’ Bill That Lets Hospitals Deny Life-Savin

    In their latest assault on women’s health, this week House Republicans will take up HR 358, the ironically titled “Protect Life Act.” Opponents have rechristened the measure the “Let Women Die” bill because it would allow hospitals that receive federal funds to turn away a woman seeking an abortion in all circumstances, even if an abortion is necessary to save her life:

    The House is scheduled to vote this week on a new bill that would allow federally-funded hospitals that oppose abortions to refuse to perform the procedure, even in cases where a woman would die without it.

    Under current law, every hospital that receives Medicare or Medicaid money is legally required to provide emergency care to any patient in need, regardless of his or her financial situation. If a hospital is unable to provide what the patient needs — including a life-saving abortion — it has to transfer the patient to a hospital that can.

    Under H.R. 358, dubbed the “Protect Life Act” and sponsored by Rep. Joe Pitts (R-Pa.), hospitals that don’t want to provide abortions could refuse to do so, even for a pregnant woman with a life-threatening complication that requires a doctor terminate her pregnancy. This provision would apply to the more than 600 Catholic hospitals governed by the Catholic Health Association, which are regulated by bishops and prohibited from performing abortions.

    The bill also prohibits federal funds from going to health care plans that cover any abortion services, which might prompt insurers to stop covering abortions. That outcome would disproportionately impact poor women who can’t afford to pay for abortions out of pocket.

  • #2
    Tell me, why are all these kinds of bills that severely impact women always written by men?

    Comment


    • #3
      Those who speak loudest often are the only ones heard. Some guys are good at being heard, even if they are spouting nonsense. Anyhow a lot of things like that confuse me. Laws about how to raise children made by people who have never had a child, laws about marriage made by people who are not married..anything like that just does not make much sense. Saying 'hey you can't vote on this because' would be even worse though. So

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Crazedclerkthe2nd View Post
        Tell me, why are all these kinds of bills that severely impact women always written by men?
        Because there are 362 men in Congress and only 76 women thus it is much more likely to be a guy writing it.

        This bill will get shot down as it should, but absurd that people keep trying it. Can't wait for this older generation to be kicked out of power so the younger generation can bring the way to more rights for people.
        Violence has resolved more conflicts than anything else. The contrary opinion that violence doesn't solve anything is merely wishful thinking at its worst. - Starship Troopers

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Greenday View Post
          Because there are 362 men in Congress and only 76 women thus it is much more likely to be a guy writing it.

          This bill will get shot down as it should, but absurd that people keep trying it. Can't wait for this older generation to be kicked out of power so the younger generation can bring the way to more rights for people.
          It might pass in the House (which is Republican controlled) but will not be taken up in the Senate at all (Democrats control). It is a symbolic vote, this bill has no chance of passing. What it does is allow Republican Congressmen to establish their pro life street cred before the 2012 election.
          Good news! Your insurance company says they'll cover you. Unfortunately, they also say it will be with dirt.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Panacea View Post
            It might pass in the House (which is Republican controlled) but will not be taken up in the Senate at all (Democrats control). It is a symbolic vote, this bill has no chance of passing. What it does is allow Republican Congressmen to establish their pro life street cred before the 2012 election.
            Which doesn't seem smart because as the younger generation takes over, less and less people are anti-choice.
            Violence has resolved more conflicts than anything else. The contrary opinion that violence doesn't solve anything is merely wishful thinking at its worst. - Starship Troopers

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Greenday View Post
              Which doesn't seem smart because as the younger generation takes over, less and less people are anti-choice.
              Unfortunately, that shift is almost glacial in it's lack of speed.

              Too much of this fight is along religious lines, and young people are just as prone to being religiously-motivated assholes as their parents.

              ^-.-^
              Faith is about what you do. It's about aspiring to be better and nobler and kinder than you are. It's about making sacrifices for the good of others. - Dresden

              Comment


              • #8
                Here in the Jesus lovin South there are MANY strongly pro life young people, I suspect that's why we have one of the highest teen preganancy rates in the nation.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Greenday View Post
                  Which doesn't seem smart because as the younger generation takes over, less and less people are anti-choice.
                  You'd think, but a lot of politicians have what equates to a death grip on their positions. The phrase "pry it from my cold dead hands" seems appropriate.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Da...oll030122.html

                    Men and women are actually split fairly evenly in their support/opposition of abortion rights. There are plenty of anti-choice women out there, too (e.g. Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin, Ann Coulter, Christine O'Donnell, Phyllis Schlafly). In fact, if I remember correctly, Bachman has authored some anti-choice legislation of her own.

                    With this said, let's please try to avoid the typical feminist tactic of blaming all anti-choice measures on men.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Greenday View Post
                      Which doesn't seem smart because as the younger generation takes over, less and less people are anti-choice.
                      There's some truth to that. The Millennials are, as a generation, more tolerant and accepting of differences in others than Gen Xers or Baby Boomers. There are exceptions of course, and some young people are just as hidebound as their elders.

                      But I think the pendulum is swinging the other way, and the abortion issue will become less and less important as the years go by.

                      Originally posted by guywithashovel View Post
                      http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Da...oll030122.html

                      Men and women are actually split fairly evenly in their support/opposition of abortion rights. There are plenty of anti-choice women out there, too (e.g. Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin, Ann Coulter, Christine O'Donnell, Phyllis Schlafly). In fact, if I remember correctly, Bachman has authored some anti-choice legislation of her own.

                      With this said, let's please try to avoid the typical feminist tactic of blaming all anti-choice measures on men.
                      Agreed. This has never been a male vs female issue, and some of the earliest feminists were anti-choice (though pro birth control).

                      In spite of what I said above, the majority of Americans now support abortion rights in the case of incest, rape, or to protect the health of the woman. Access to abortion on demand is about 50-50. Too close to call.

                      That's why the pro life folks are looking for other ways to restrict abortion rights. They haven't won their argument in spite of decades of demonstrations, grisly educational materials, court fights, and murders of doctors. Whittling away at abortion one procedure at a time, along with the emotional blackmail of forced ultrasounds is their current tactic, and they've made some gains though I don't think they'll win the war.
                      Good news! Your insurance company says they'll cover you. Unfortunately, they also say it will be with dirt.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        So what exactly was the point of this anyway?

                        You already can't use taxpayer money to fund abortion services and apparently the Bill itself has a loophole that lets you use federal subsidies anyway. So literally the only thing this Bill adds is the "Oh well, you can die on the floor of the waiting room" part by removing the requirement for hospitals to transfer a woman whose life is in danger from a pregnancy to a facility that can actually help her.

                        I can see why its called the "Let Women Die" bill. -.-

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The House has now passed this bill, but it will most likely die a quick death in the Senate.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Greenday View Post
                            Can't wait for this older generation to be kicked out of power so the younger generation can bring the way to more rights for people.
                            If these idiot right-wingers keep going the way they're going, it won't be long at all.
                            Last edited by XCashier; 10-15-2011, 02:48 PM.
                            People behave as if they were actors in their own reality show. -- Panacea
                            If you're gonna be one of the people who say it's time to make America great again, stop being one of the reasons America isn't great right now. --Jester

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Gravekeeper View Post
                              So what exactly was the point of this anyway?

                              You already can't use taxpayer money to fund abortion services and apparently the Bill itself has a loophole that lets you use federal subsidies anyway. So literally the only thing this Bill adds is the "Oh well, you can die on the floor of the waiting room" part by removing the requirement for hospitals to transfer a woman whose life is in danger from a pregnancy to a facility that can actually help her.

                              I can see why its called the "Let Women Die" bill. -.-
                              And that's assuming the hospital would even transfer the woman, knowing the receiving hospital is going to "murder" the "unborn."

                              This is a horrible law. Fortunately, it won't pass.
                              Good news! Your insurance company says they'll cover you. Unfortunately, they also say it will be with dirt.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X