Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Did Anonymous block Karl Rove's plan to take over the election?
Collapse
X
-
I sure can't stand that group. I believe they are borderline terrorists. But if they actually stopped someone from rigging the election, I guess I can't be too pissed at them for this one.Violence has resolved more conflicts than anything else. The contrary opinion that violence doesn't solve anything is merely wishful thinking at its worst. - Starship Troopers
-
If they DID, why wouldn't they release the information?
Doing something huge and only vaguely implying they've done it doesn't seem to be their style.
If you know someone has committed what is effectively treason against the United States government...
Why would they not try to keep such a person from doing it again?
In general, Anonymous are a lot of things. Stupid is not one of them. And "I will release this information on a website" is not a threat to someone who is willing to attempt to rig the United States Presidential election.
Karl Rove is still rich. He can still throw huge amounts of money at any cause he wants, he can still be an effective lobbiest.
If he tried to rig the election, and someone KNEW about it... What the hell possible justification do they have for letting him go with "Don't do it again?""Nam castum esse decet pium poetam
ipsum, versiculos nihil necessest"
Comment
-
anon might not release the info, since showing they actually have the data means that they are also proving that they too hacked the government. not the best of ideas.
but anon has done shit before on a mass scale. like after megaupload went down.
they may be "terrorists", but they are internal terrorists, and usually only act en masse when it's for a good cause. they troll in small clans, but break out the big guns only when it's worth it, since if they get caught they would get one heck of jail time themselves.
posting at 3am so might be illogicalAll uses of You, You're, and etc are generic unless specified otherwise.
Comment
-
I'm torn on this.
On the one hand this is wild conspiracy theory and there's no evidence to support it. In addition as of late Anon has been doing more hacking claims than actual hacking (a number of their "we hacked this" lately has been debunked).
On the other hand it does put a considerable explanation into Rove's infamous blowup on Fox. He did come close to saying that the numbers must be faked because he knew the "true" numbers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lordlundar View PostOn the other hand it does put a considerable explanation into Rove's infamous blowup on Fox. He did come close to saying that the numbers must be faked because he knew the "true" numbers.
What you saw was the end of his career and political relevance. -.-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gravekeeper View PostHis blow up was because a lot of very rich, very powerful people had given him a lot of money to work Romney's campaign and he'd been assuring them for weeks this would be a total landslide.
What you saw was the end of his career and political relevance. -.-
I'm no fan of Karl Rove and I don't think he's capable of pulling something like this off. I think the "conspiracy" was made up after the fact. If Anon did block him then they need to publish the way he was trying to accomplish this so it can be blocked in the future.Cry Havoc and let slip the marsupials of war!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nekojin View PostInteresting, if true, but I don't see how Rove and company can ever be prosecuted for it.
The original link and the Anon claims are full of shit.Good news! Your insurance company says they'll cover you. Unfortunately, they also say it will be with dirt.
Comment
-
His blow up was because a lot of very rich, very powerful people had given him a lot of money to work Romney's campaign and he'd been assuring them for weeks this would be a total landslide.
What you saw was the end of his career and political relevance. -.-
Which isn't to say the Anonymous story is true."My in-laws are country people and at night you can hear their distinctive howl."
Comment
-
Originally posted by HYHYBT View PostThe trouble is, while that explains why he didn't *like* the result, it doesn't even begin to explain his apparent certainty that he couldn't lose a state which all polling agreed was going to be close.
Which isn't to say the Anonymous story is true.
Comment
Comment