Interesting topic, no?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3055988.html
According to the article, the 6th circuit said that "expectation of privacy" doesn't go bye-bye just cos you use a 3rd party source. But that it's just a circuit court not the supreme court, and the IRS manuals still "continues to claim" that it doesn't need a warrant.
http://www.irs.gov/irm/part9/irm_09-004-006.html#d0e319 (link is left cold)
Look for section 9.4.6.7.3.3 (09-05-2008)
I'm not going to copy/paste the rules but it does specify that they consider "contents of a wire or electronic communication" to be open game WITHOUT a warrant after 180 days of storage. And that they can get a warrant, but they can also just use court order or subpoena.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3055988.html
The files were released to the American Civil Liberties Union under a Freedom of Information Act request. The organization is working to determine just how broadly federal law enforcement agencies like the FBI or the IRS' Criminal Tax Division interpret their authority to snoop through inboxes.
The IRS apparently interprets that authority very broadly, the documents show: as long as you've stored your email in a cloud service like Google Mail, and as long as those emails haven't been deleted after a few months, the agency thinks it doesn't need a warrant to read them.
The IRS apparently interprets that authority very broadly, the documents show: as long as you've stored your email in a cloud service like Google Mail, and as long as those emails haven't been deleted after a few months, the agency thinks it doesn't need a warrant to read them.
http://www.irs.gov/irm/part9/irm_09-004-006.html#d0e319 (link is left cold)
Look for section 9.4.6.7.3.3 (09-05-2008)
I'm not going to copy/paste the rules but it does specify that they consider "contents of a wire or electronic communication" to be open game WITHOUT a warrant after 180 days of storage. And that they can get a warrant, but they can also just use court order or subpoena.
Comment