It's something I hear a lot, and it's something I've said myself on occasion. But I think that it's something that also needs to be scrutinized before saying it, because I think there are situations where it shouldn't be used.
In fact, I think that we should have mandatory voting. Have it in a way that makes voting totally accessible for everyone, and have it in a way that people are able to turn in a ballot of "Nobody" or "Fishsticks," but I always felt that having an opt-out system is always better for getting stuff done than an opt-in.
I think it only applies to if you say a different candidate would have done better. If I think that Mitt Romney would have been better, but didn't vote, then I really shouldn't be complaining about that. Even if I think that someone like Jill Stein or Gary Johnson would have done better as president. I think you have to say something to be heard.
However, if you don't think ANYONE on the ballot would have done well for the job, you really should be able to complain. If you don't like absolutely any of the Presidential candidates, then your not voting for a Presidential Candidate shouldn't keep you from complaining about the President. If you have some objection to the political process, you should be able to opt out of it. I think if your problem is "They all suck!" then that's a fine thing to complain about. You shouldn't have to walk in and just right down your dad's name to be able to complain.
The other thing is if you're complaining about a trait that all the candidates shared. If I didn't vote for Congressman because all the congressmen on the ballot opposed gay marriage, I think I would have every right to complain about their gay-marriage opposing ways.
These are just some random thoughts on that statement.
In fact, I think that we should have mandatory voting. Have it in a way that makes voting totally accessible for everyone, and have it in a way that people are able to turn in a ballot of "Nobody" or "Fishsticks," but I always felt that having an opt-out system is always better for getting stuff done than an opt-in.
I think it only applies to if you say a different candidate would have done better. If I think that Mitt Romney would have been better, but didn't vote, then I really shouldn't be complaining about that. Even if I think that someone like Jill Stein or Gary Johnson would have done better as president. I think you have to say something to be heard.
However, if you don't think ANYONE on the ballot would have done well for the job, you really should be able to complain. If you don't like absolutely any of the Presidential candidates, then your not voting for a Presidential Candidate shouldn't keep you from complaining about the President. If you have some objection to the political process, you should be able to opt out of it. I think if your problem is "They all suck!" then that's a fine thing to complain about. You shouldn't have to walk in and just right down your dad's name to be able to complain.
The other thing is if you're complaining about a trait that all the candidates shared. If I didn't vote for Congressman because all the congressmen on the ballot opposed gay marriage, I think I would have every right to complain about their gay-marriage opposing ways.
These are just some random thoughts on that statement.
Comment