I went into Split not knowing it was by M. Night Shamyalan. By the opening scene I did and I spent the whole movie looking for the twist.
Spoiler there wasn't one. Instead it was a brilliantly structured film that gave you all of the information necessary to understand the conclusions it reached at each part of the story. Even the "surprise" bit at the ending that people call a twist isn't a twist but rather an organic extension of the plot and more of an Easter Egg for a planned sequel.
Calling it a twist would be like calling any of the Marvel after credits scenes "twists" (I know some are but most of them were not)
So the topic here is should a director's name be buried on a movie if 1) your building the marketing not on his name but on the movie itself and 2) If it will affect the way you watch the movie?
My argument is that I would have been more immersed if I wasn't stuck looking for his trademark twist. He has a thing. If I go to see a Kevin Smith film I am going to look for Jay and Silent Bob to show up or be referenced in some way.
Quentin Tarantino it's going to be uber violent.
Now if the whole selling point of the movie is "THIS DIRECTOR MADE THIS" then great slap their name front and center. Every preview I saw for Split and not once did I realize it was by M. Night.
I am sitting watching the movie though and the first thing after the title is his name in huge font. Immediately I downshifted from "sit back and enjoy" to "lean forward and examine"
It's like the difference between reading a murder mystery or reading an Encyclopedia Brown book where you're going to be asked to solve the mystery first.
Especially if you're going to move away from your trademark I argue leave your name off of the opening credits.
It would be similar to what the movie Seven did. Kevin Spacey never appears in the marketing, the opening credits, or anything until halfway through the movie. His big reveal in the police station is his big reveal and it's brilliant. You're not meant to know who the killer is until then.
If M. Night had done a twist not knowing it was his movie would have made the twist a surprise. And given that there wasn't one it would have kept viewers like me from looking for one.
Spoiler there wasn't one. Instead it was a brilliantly structured film that gave you all of the information necessary to understand the conclusions it reached at each part of the story. Even the "surprise" bit at the ending that people call a twist isn't a twist but rather an organic extension of the plot and more of an Easter Egg for a planned sequel.
Calling it a twist would be like calling any of the Marvel after credits scenes "twists" (I know some are but most of them were not)
So the topic here is should a director's name be buried on a movie if 1) your building the marketing not on his name but on the movie itself and 2) If it will affect the way you watch the movie?
My argument is that I would have been more immersed if I wasn't stuck looking for his trademark twist. He has a thing. If I go to see a Kevin Smith film I am going to look for Jay and Silent Bob to show up or be referenced in some way.
Quentin Tarantino it's going to be uber violent.
Now if the whole selling point of the movie is "THIS DIRECTOR MADE THIS" then great slap their name front and center. Every preview I saw for Split and not once did I realize it was by M. Night.
I am sitting watching the movie though and the first thing after the title is his name in huge font. Immediately I downshifted from "sit back and enjoy" to "lean forward and examine"
It's like the difference between reading a murder mystery or reading an Encyclopedia Brown book where you're going to be asked to solve the mystery first.
Especially if you're going to move away from your trademark I argue leave your name off of the opening credits.
It would be similar to what the movie Seven did. Kevin Spacey never appears in the marketing, the opening credits, or anything until halfway through the movie. His big reveal in the police station is his big reveal and it's brilliant. You're not meant to know who the killer is until then.
If M. Night had done a twist not knowing it was his movie would have made the twist a surprise. And given that there wasn't one it would have kept viewers like me from looking for one.
Comment