As a historian, there are some facets of culture and history I particularly enjoy. One of which is folklore. A part of that folklore are the legends of Cryptids, that is, animals/creatures unknown to science but believed to exist. These include the Sasquatch, Yowie, Almas, Yeti, El Chupacabra, Ogopogo, Mokole-mbembe, Nessie, etc. I catch the History Channel's Monster Quest whenever I can due to my interest.
Now then, I approach this with the skepticism of a researcher, like I've been taught to do as a historian. However, historically, folklore has never been without some hint of truth. After all, the mountain gorilla was folklore until they were "discovered" by Western science. The same with the okampi. And if you put into account all of the sightings, even if a good 80% or so can be relegated to hoaxes or misunderstandings of familiar wildlife (bears etc) there's still a good number of unexplainable sightings and evidence.
I suppose then, my purpose for this thread is, what's the deal? Do these exist? Is there validity to the sightings, or are the witnesses and researchers just buying into a big hoax?
Now then, I approach this with the skepticism of a researcher, like I've been taught to do as a historian. However, historically, folklore has never been without some hint of truth. After all, the mountain gorilla was folklore until they were "discovered" by Western science. The same with the okampi. And if you put into account all of the sightings, even if a good 80% or so can be relegated to hoaxes or misunderstandings of familiar wildlife (bears etc) there's still a good number of unexplainable sightings and evidence.
I suppose then, my purpose for this thread is, what's the deal? Do these exist? Is there validity to the sightings, or are the witnesses and researchers just buying into a big hoax?
Comment