One thing that's been in the news about a week ago is the announcement that researchers have gone over the recordings of police radio from the Kennedy shooting, and have determined conclusively that there was no fourth shot, and therefore no second gunman (with 3 shots being accounted for as definitely fired by Oswald). Within days of this hitting the media, a certain bastion of journalistic integrity (cough, cough), the National Enquirer, has as its headline that there is proof of a second gunman.
Seriously, how long are they going to keep rehashing the Kennedy assasination? Considering it was 50 years ago, even if there were others involved, with each passing year it becomes less likely that they could be brought to justice (i.e. dying of old age).
Seriously, how long are they going to keep rehashing the Kennedy assasination? Considering it was 50 years ago, even if there were others involved, with each passing year it becomes less likely that they could be brought to justice (i.e. dying of old age).
Comment