Recently one of my extended family died. I didn't know her very well, but I decided to come along and pay respects.
So the Hindu pundit was having a ceremony, just him and the surviving son. I stayed to observe, not participate. Why they had it in their freezing cold garage I have no idea. So, a lot of Sanskrit (I think) prayers spoken, offerings for the dead placed on leaves. One of said offerings was wool, in case the dead got cold. Sounded silly to my atheist ears, but I didn't go there to judge. But apparently the pundit had other ideas.
So I'm trying not to nod off in the cold garage, while in my head contemplating exactly how money-less economics in the Star Trek universe might actually work, when this came out of the pundit's mouth:
"...and that's why there's so many gays and lesbians in the world."
Wait what?
Now he had my full attention.
"They think they can act against the laws of nature, but they can't escape their karma."
Dafuq?! That just came out of left-field. LGBT issues don't affect me personally, but ignorance and stupidity grind my gears.
First, for the record, same-sex relations have been observed in nature.
So this notion that gays and lesbians are acting against the laws of nature is demonstrably false. Does his god reward ignorance?
Second, I guess it never occurred to this pundit that maybe his god made gays and lesbians what they are. Who is he to judge people for what they are?
Third, why the FUCK is he bringing up gays and lesbians at all?
I wanted to demand to know if the pundit was here to pray for the dead, or espouse bigotry and stupidity against the living? But I didn't. Sadly I know all too well how religion can cloud the intellect, where normally intelligent and reasonable people turn into blithering buffoons. I ended up making a sound of disgust and walking out the room. I don't think anyone picked up on that.
Mind you I couldn't care less if my relatives thought less of me for daring to question a pundit. But I also didn't think raising a stink would have accomplished anything either. If I ever meet that pundit again, I fully intend to, as politely as possible, tell him exactly what I think of him. Again I don't expect much, he's an old guy and probably very set in his ways, and wouldn't appreciate being schooled by someone younger than he. But you never know.
So the Hindu pundit was having a ceremony, just him and the surviving son. I stayed to observe, not participate. Why they had it in their freezing cold garage I have no idea. So, a lot of Sanskrit (I think) prayers spoken, offerings for the dead placed on leaves. One of said offerings was wool, in case the dead got cold. Sounded silly to my atheist ears, but I didn't go there to judge. But apparently the pundit had other ideas.
So I'm trying not to nod off in the cold garage, while in my head contemplating exactly how money-less economics in the Star Trek universe might actually work, when this came out of the pundit's mouth:
"...and that's why there's so many gays and lesbians in the world."
Wait what?
Now he had my full attention.
"They think they can act against the laws of nature, but they can't escape their karma."
Dafuq?! That just came out of left-field. LGBT issues don't affect me personally, but ignorance and stupidity grind my gears.
First, for the record, same-sex relations have been observed in nature.
So this notion that gays and lesbians are acting against the laws of nature is demonstrably false. Does his god reward ignorance?
Second, I guess it never occurred to this pundit that maybe his god made gays and lesbians what they are. Who is he to judge people for what they are?
Third, why the FUCK is he bringing up gays and lesbians at all?
I wanted to demand to know if the pundit was here to pray for the dead, or espouse bigotry and stupidity against the living? But I didn't. Sadly I know all too well how religion can cloud the intellect, where normally intelligent and reasonable people turn into blithering buffoons. I ended up making a sound of disgust and walking out the room. I don't think anyone picked up on that.
Mind you I couldn't care less if my relatives thought less of me for daring to question a pundit. But I also didn't think raising a stink would have accomplished anything either. If I ever meet that pundit again, I fully intend to, as politely as possible, tell him exactly what I think of him. Again I don't expect much, he's an old guy and probably very set in his ways, and wouldn't appreciate being schooled by someone younger than he. But you never know.
Comment