I've not met your nephew, Ree, but I can respect his attitude. It's something I share - you don't need to follow religion to do what is commonly called 'good' or 'right'. I have met you, though, and I know you're not someone who tries to force their views on others in the way Phelps et al do. It's in much the same way that I don't picket the pavements outside churches as people are leaving waving placards saying, "You just wasted part of your life."
Actually, it would be funny to go to Phelpsville and do that ... but I digress.
Rahmota - you're right about those who attack religion being overzealous as well. However, I often see them going for the jugular as soon as they learn that someone has a faith. A friend of mine gets the same result - he's a vegetarian, but doesn't mind if people eat meat in his presence. If he is with people who he doesn't know so well and he asks if there's a vegetarian option, he invariably gets comments about how his shoes are made of leather etc. To me, that's just as bad as the extreme zealots who wave their holy texts around at everything.
Ree, you spoke about the way people wanted rid of all christian values. I suspect that in analysis, this isn't entirely correct. I've read the ten commandments, which are supposed to be the basis of actions in the old testament (give or take), and there are good points in there on most of them. Don't kill, respect your parents, not coveting your neighbour's ox looks to me like don't steal etc. Such things are those are needed to form a working society. I just don't see any need to blame or praise a supernatural force for them. I also don't think that most people would want the laws regarding theft and violence repealed.
I do see fuzzy religions starting off. David Koresh started his own brand of christianity within my lifetime, and we all know how that ended up. I've seen the rise of 'intelligent design', which is to me an acceptance of the way science has eroded faith to such an extent that some religious people are trying to shoehorn their beliefs into society in some way, no matter how ludicrous. That's a whole different thread.
For me, my problem with religion is not what it says, for the most part, but the reason why we ought to obey those strictures. It's a fear-based system, and that forces people to go along with the stupid aspects (not wearing clothes made of two different fabrics? are they kidding me?) as well as the sensible. That fear is then passed on by the zealots who warn of an unprovable punishment for anyone not doing what they say.
Rapscallion
Actually, it would be funny to go to Phelpsville and do that ... but I digress.
Rahmota - you're right about those who attack religion being overzealous as well. However, I often see them going for the jugular as soon as they learn that someone has a faith. A friend of mine gets the same result - he's a vegetarian, but doesn't mind if people eat meat in his presence. If he is with people who he doesn't know so well and he asks if there's a vegetarian option, he invariably gets comments about how his shoes are made of leather etc. To me, that's just as bad as the extreme zealots who wave their holy texts around at everything.
Ree, you spoke about the way people wanted rid of all christian values. I suspect that in analysis, this isn't entirely correct. I've read the ten commandments, which are supposed to be the basis of actions in the old testament (give or take), and there are good points in there on most of them. Don't kill, respect your parents, not coveting your neighbour's ox looks to me like don't steal etc. Such things are those are needed to form a working society. I just don't see any need to blame or praise a supernatural force for them. I also don't think that most people would want the laws regarding theft and violence repealed.
I do see fuzzy religions starting off. David Koresh started his own brand of christianity within my lifetime, and we all know how that ended up. I've seen the rise of 'intelligent design', which is to me an acceptance of the way science has eroded faith to such an extent that some religious people are trying to shoehorn their beliefs into society in some way, no matter how ludicrous. That's a whole different thread.
For me, my problem with religion is not what it says, for the most part, but the reason why we ought to obey those strictures. It's a fear-based system, and that forces people to go along with the stupid aspects (not wearing clothes made of two different fabrics? are they kidding me?) as well as the sensible. That fear is then passed on by the zealots who warn of an unprovable punishment for anyone not doing what they say.
Rapscallion
Comment