Originally posted by fireheart17
View Post
I love what one of the preachers had to say:
Mr Corneloup denied preachers were hassling commuters and claimed their methods aboard trains were conducted in a "more gentlemanly" way than the Rundle Mall gatherings.
"It is a really good environment for preaching," Mr Corneloup said. "You have got a captive audience and it is much easier to get your message across. You are able to preach in a lower voice."
"It is a really good environment for preaching," Mr Corneloup said. "You have got a captive audience and it is much easier to get your message across. You are able to preach in a lower voice."
On the one hand, he admits to keeping a "captive" audience (which is true, they can't get away from him if they want to catch the train they paid for), yet denies he is harassing commuters?
I call BS on that one.
I'm not sure how that would play in the US. They'd probably get away with it here, I think the courts have pretty much ruled street preaching OK unless it creates a public disturbance, and even then it has to be pretty extreme.
Comment