I feel the need to address this. I've been reading a few threads in the religion section and noticed typical misconceptions arrising. Since the thread in particular was already off topic, I figured I'd start a new one to not send the thread further off topic.
The first misconception: People who leave were in the wrong church or didn't have the correct understanding.
Which church? Which understanding? Everyone seems to have their own spin on what it means to be a Christian. Someone argues that Jesus dying for our sins makes no sense, but oh! That parts not meant to be taken literally. There's always a different way to interperate it. Which brings the question, why would God be so cryptic? Or more importantly, why should we believe one interpretation over another?
It could be argued that the details don't matter much and all that matters is "love God and love your neighbors"? But even those simple messages can be interpretated different ways. I've heard some take horrifying martyr like extremes on "loving your neighbor as you love yourself" so even those messages can have different spins.
Which brings me to my next one.
You've closed your mind to the possibility of God.
Not true. I still consider the possibilty of God existing. Heck, I don't even think it's that far out there. What I reject is the idea that God is taking an active role in our day to day life. If God does exist, he's pretty subtle and doesn't make himself that known. Because of that, it's natural to doubt, especially when you're expected to base your life around the idea.
I've listened to several apologetic arguements attempting to explain away the doubts, but they tend to be full of logical fallacies. And they still don't prove anything. Just because I want more proof before I base my life around something doesn't mean I'm closed minded.
You just want to live an immoral life
I haven't heard this one anywhere here and I'm glad because it's the one that pisses me off the most. As if Christian morality is the perfect morality that everyone should live by. Even if you don't take a literalist approach to the bible, a lot of the things which are deemed "sins" shouldn't even be a big deal. I've already explained why most of the sexual sins are stupid here.
Now I'm speaking for myself here, but I believe if it's not hurting anyone, it shouldn't be a problem. If anything, I would argue trying to live up to some of these standards is actually harmful. I've heard all the arguments on original sin, but in the end, it all sounds the same, "god screwed up making us so now we have to strive to live the way he wants otherwise he'll condemn us to some form of hell, but he loves you". Bullshit! (And the whole concept of hell is something worth another thread. )
So even if someone does leave the faith because they're sick of Christian morality, I can't say I blame them. All the guilt, high standards, feeling of unworthiness, and self defeating behavior should be discouraged, not encouraged. And even churches that aren't super conservative tend to have some kind of guilt tripping since the main idea of Christianity is that Jesus paid for our sins. The guilt may be more subtle, but it’s there.
To conclude, I think a lot of Christians underestimate how much EX followers know and underestimate their experience. Of course there are exceptions, but from what I read, a lot of the reasoning behind leaving are much more complicated. And even then, it’s easy to get alienated by judgmental comments about how selfish or close minded non believers are.
And fo reference, here's a site listing deconversion stories. A lot are pretty extreme, but they get the point across.
The first misconception: People who leave were in the wrong church or didn't have the correct understanding.
Which church? Which understanding? Everyone seems to have their own spin on what it means to be a Christian. Someone argues that Jesus dying for our sins makes no sense, but oh! That parts not meant to be taken literally. There's always a different way to interperate it. Which brings the question, why would God be so cryptic? Or more importantly, why should we believe one interpretation over another?
It could be argued that the details don't matter much and all that matters is "love God and love your neighbors"? But even those simple messages can be interpretated different ways. I've heard some take horrifying martyr like extremes on "loving your neighbor as you love yourself" so even those messages can have different spins.
Which brings me to my next one.
You've closed your mind to the possibility of God.
Not true. I still consider the possibilty of God existing. Heck, I don't even think it's that far out there. What I reject is the idea that God is taking an active role in our day to day life. If God does exist, he's pretty subtle and doesn't make himself that known. Because of that, it's natural to doubt, especially when you're expected to base your life around the idea.
I've listened to several apologetic arguements attempting to explain away the doubts, but they tend to be full of logical fallacies. And they still don't prove anything. Just because I want more proof before I base my life around something doesn't mean I'm closed minded.
You just want to live an immoral life
I haven't heard this one anywhere here and I'm glad because it's the one that pisses me off the most. As if Christian morality is the perfect morality that everyone should live by. Even if you don't take a literalist approach to the bible, a lot of the things which are deemed "sins" shouldn't even be a big deal. I've already explained why most of the sexual sins are stupid here.
Now I'm speaking for myself here, but I believe if it's not hurting anyone, it shouldn't be a problem. If anything, I would argue trying to live up to some of these standards is actually harmful. I've heard all the arguments on original sin, but in the end, it all sounds the same, "god screwed up making us so now we have to strive to live the way he wants otherwise he'll condemn us to some form of hell, but he loves you". Bullshit! (And the whole concept of hell is something worth another thread. )
So even if someone does leave the faith because they're sick of Christian morality, I can't say I blame them. All the guilt, high standards, feeling of unworthiness, and self defeating behavior should be discouraged, not encouraged. And even churches that aren't super conservative tend to have some kind of guilt tripping since the main idea of Christianity is that Jesus paid for our sins. The guilt may be more subtle, but it’s there.
To conclude, I think a lot of Christians underestimate how much EX followers know and underestimate their experience. Of course there are exceptions, but from what I read, a lot of the reasoning behind leaving are much more complicated. And even then, it’s easy to get alienated by judgmental comments about how selfish or close minded non believers are.
And fo reference, here's a site listing deconversion stories. A lot are pretty extreme, but they get the point across.
Comment