First story, who's telling the truth? The lady, or Wal-Mart?
http://kfor.com/2015/12/06/woman-hop...ng-experience/
TL;DR: A lady is in line at Wal-Mart. Cashier is struggling with his duties, and is being berated by another customer. Lady steps in and yells at customer (or something). Cashier (of course) thanks lady and hugs her, then tells lady that his mother committed suicide that morning.
Lady then makes "insipirational" video about how we should be nice to each other.
Problem is, Wal-Mart says it never happened, that they spoke to said employee, and said employee says his mother is still alive.
Second story:
http://www.snopes.com/2015/12/02/meijer-cake-glurge/
Snopes says false, but the lady is sticking to her story.
TL;DR:
Lady orders a cake to be decorated. Bakery girl (who we later find out is "not allowed to" decorate cakes) decorates cake. Lady takes it to cashier, who notices writing is...off. They apparently find it funny, so they gather other employees around who start taking pictures. Manager says bakery girl has autism and isn't allowed to decorate cakes (or something like that). Then lady plays the "kindhearted" card and says she wouldn't "let them" discount the cake.
Problem is: The story reeks of red flags. In other words, it hits a lot of the common themes of a hoax. This lady, too, is sticking by her story.
So, in the two stories above, who's telling the truth, and who isn't?
http://kfor.com/2015/12/06/woman-hop...ng-experience/
TL;DR: A lady is in line at Wal-Mart. Cashier is struggling with his duties, and is being berated by another customer. Lady steps in and yells at customer (or something). Cashier (of course) thanks lady and hugs her, then tells lady that his mother committed suicide that morning.
Lady then makes "insipirational" video about how we should be nice to each other.
Problem is, Wal-Mart says it never happened, that they spoke to said employee, and said employee says his mother is still alive.
Second story:
http://www.snopes.com/2015/12/02/meijer-cake-glurge/
Snopes says false, but the lady is sticking to her story.
TL;DR:
Lady orders a cake to be decorated. Bakery girl (who we later find out is "not allowed to" decorate cakes) decorates cake. Lady takes it to cashier, who notices writing is...off. They apparently find it funny, so they gather other employees around who start taking pictures. Manager says bakery girl has autism and isn't allowed to decorate cakes (or something like that). Then lady plays the "kindhearted" card and says she wouldn't "let them" discount the cake.
Problem is: The story reeks of red flags. In other words, it hits a lot of the common themes of a hoax. This lady, too, is sticking by her story.
So, in the two stories above, who's telling the truth, and who isn't?
Comment