We all know second hand smoke is bad for you. But exactly how bad?
It seems like every time they do a test on it, its like "Here, we locked this rat in a glass box, and we're going to fill it with the smoke from 30 cartons of marlboro reds!"
Which isn't realistic.
I'm wondering if there have been specific tests done to see how far the smoke travels and how long it persists in an area.
For instance, they banned smoking in cars with children in my state a while back. The information they used to support this law was an example of a guy smoking in a stationary vehicle with the windows rolled up. Of COURSE that's bad! But put it in a realistic situation - child in the back seat, opposite side of the smoker, car is moving, window is cracked. Watch all the smoke waft right out the window. Where's the danger to the child?
I also saw a commercial on TV that showed a father smoking downstairs in the living room, and the smoke took on this living entity, traveled upstairs, down the hall, opened the door and went into the child's room. It wasn't supposed to be a metaphor for the evils of smoking, they were trying to depict that smoke actually does that.
I'd be interested in seeing some actual test results. Say, put a "cigarette sensor" in the back seat of a car, and see how much it actually picks up while you're driving and smoking. Or put them in different rooms of the house, and test how far the smoke gets from the smoker, and how long it stays there and has actual cancerous effects on people.
It seems like every time they do a test on it, its like "Here, we locked this rat in a glass box, and we're going to fill it with the smoke from 30 cartons of marlboro reds!"
Which isn't realistic.
I'm wondering if there have been specific tests done to see how far the smoke travels and how long it persists in an area.
For instance, they banned smoking in cars with children in my state a while back. The information they used to support this law was an example of a guy smoking in a stationary vehicle with the windows rolled up. Of COURSE that's bad! But put it in a realistic situation - child in the back seat, opposite side of the smoker, car is moving, window is cracked. Watch all the smoke waft right out the window. Where's the danger to the child?
I also saw a commercial on TV that showed a father smoking downstairs in the living room, and the smoke took on this living entity, traveled upstairs, down the hall, opened the door and went into the child's room. It wasn't supposed to be a metaphor for the evils of smoking, they were trying to depict that smoke actually does that.
I'd be interested in seeing some actual test results. Say, put a "cigarette sensor" in the back seat of a car, and see how much it actually picks up while you're driving and smoking. Or put them in different rooms of the house, and test how far the smoke gets from the smoker, and how long it stays there and has actual cancerous effects on people.
Comment