http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,536742,00.html
For those who haven't seen it on the news, a woman was driving home from a family party with five kids in her van. She got on the highway to go home, except she was on the wrong side and going AGAINST traffic. She drove that way for two miles before crashing into another car, killing all three of the other car's occupants, her daughter and three nieces in her car, wounded her son, and killing herself. The wounded son is recovering in the hospital right now.
Now, when I first heard this, I thought, "She drove TWO miles on a busy highway the wrong way? She must have been drunk or high!" Reports by the family said she rarely drank and she never smoked weed.
Tox reports just came back: she was drunk AND high. Now the reporters are going nuts. There are now claims that someone must have spiked her food/drinks. There are claims that the testing must have been wrong, like in the OJ case (heard a reporter say it last night). I don't buy that at all. Forensic scientists are being made out to look like incompetant morons because a couple people here and there make a mistake, so all of a sudden it's all forensic scientists. All sorts of excuses for the results.
So what do you guys think? Did the scientists running the tox screen botch it up, since according to the family she'd never drink that much or get high? Is the family full of crap?
For those who haven't seen it on the news, a woman was driving home from a family party with five kids in her van. She got on the highway to go home, except she was on the wrong side and going AGAINST traffic. She drove that way for two miles before crashing into another car, killing all three of the other car's occupants, her daughter and three nieces in her car, wounded her son, and killing herself. The wounded son is recovering in the hospital right now.
Now, when I first heard this, I thought, "She drove TWO miles on a busy highway the wrong way? She must have been drunk or high!" Reports by the family said she rarely drank and she never smoked weed.
Tox reports just came back: she was drunk AND high. Now the reporters are going nuts. There are now claims that someone must have spiked her food/drinks. There are claims that the testing must have been wrong, like in the OJ case (heard a reporter say it last night). I don't buy that at all. Forensic scientists are being made out to look like incompetant morons because a couple people here and there make a mistake, so all of a sudden it's all forensic scientists. All sorts of excuses for the results.
So what do you guys think? Did the scientists running the tox screen botch it up, since according to the family she'd never drink that much or get high? Is the family full of crap?
Comment