I wasn't sure where to put this, so I just stuck it here...the thread in Things I Hate about one partner having to hand over their paycheck to the other reminded me of this.
Back when I worked in the call center, I worked with a gal whose husband also worked for the same company. The woman, J, was in the same department as I was, and we were considered supervisor level. Her husband was a manager for a different department and made quite a bit more money than we did. But they still split all the bills equally every month. If the cell phone plan they were on was $100/month, they would each pay $50, despite the fact that J's husband pulled in more income. They split their car payment, mortgage, all their utility bills, groceries, everything, right down the middle. Often times, J wouldn't have enough money to get lunch (if she didn't bring leftovers from a previous night's meal) because she'd had to spend most/all of her last paycheck on bills. Yet her husband went out to lunch almost every day.
Personally, I don't think this was fair at all. J said she used to have a job in which she made more money, closer to what her husband makes, and they set the rule down then. I can understand that...but when she's making substantially less than he is, I don't see why she still has to pay the same amount as she used to and then not have enough money for food for herself during the week.
Thoughts?
Back when I worked in the call center, I worked with a gal whose husband also worked for the same company. The woman, J, was in the same department as I was, and we were considered supervisor level. Her husband was a manager for a different department and made quite a bit more money than we did. But they still split all the bills equally every month. If the cell phone plan they were on was $100/month, they would each pay $50, despite the fact that J's husband pulled in more income. They split their car payment, mortgage, all their utility bills, groceries, everything, right down the middle. Often times, J wouldn't have enough money to get lunch (if she didn't bring leftovers from a previous night's meal) because she'd had to spend most/all of her last paycheck on bills. Yet her husband went out to lunch almost every day.
Personally, I don't think this was fair at all. J said she used to have a job in which she made more money, closer to what her husband makes, and they set the rule down then. I can understand that...but when she's making substantially less than he is, I don't see why she still has to pay the same amount as she used to and then not have enough money for food for herself during the week.
Thoughts?
Comment