He is being arrested for what now?

[Shangri-laschild]

1) The cops were called well before the kid was told he couldn't ride the train they were called while the guy was harrassing the kid while the kid was still ignoring him. "You can't ride the train" was yelled at the kid as he was walking away.

Lets say you come home and hear a noise. You call the police and while waiting for them, you discover a burglar. Once the police are there, they are investigating a burglary, not a strange noise. Even if they were called before anything happened. I could falsely call the police and say someone was harassing me. Even if it never happened, the officers are still going to want to talk to the other person to find out what happened.

2) According to the rules that the company that employs the security guard has to follow he cannot ban him from riding the train just because he feels like it thus the kid was not trespassing.

And if his higher ups are like him and decide to back him, then yes he would have been banned. All those rules mean is that he can't ban someone unless he can get the higher ups to agree with him.

3) The cops weren't investigating they refused to speak to me until it was clear I wouldn't go away until they took my statement. They didn't ask the kid for his side. They were clearly friends of said security guard as they were on a first name basis and their behavior was that of friends. They took his words as gospel mine as shit and didn't investigate anything.

Technically, they don't have to tell you anything. You weren't directly involved. Really, they weren't even under an obligation to tell you why they were taking the kid in. You can file a fredom of information form and get the details but the officers don't have to tell you what's going on just because you were present at the time. How do you know that they didn't investigate anything?

[jackfaire]

How do you know that they didn't investigate anything?

No security cameras no other eyewitnesses stuck around. The only way to investigate what happened in that situation is by asking the people involved.

To me having to be forced to interview one of the eyewitnesses (myself) Is an attempt to avoid investigating.

That would be like having three people who saw Person X shoot Mr. Boddy and refusing to interview those three people or take their eyewitness accounts.