There are a few threads about feminism here at Fratching, and this issue has come up within those threads, but I thought it would be beneficial to branch out for this topic.
Right now, if I understand correctly, women are said to earn roughly seventy-six cents for every dollar a man makes. Obviously, this generates contempt amongst the feminist community. However, some critics argue that feminists who lament this pay gap aren't considering all the factors. For example, they say that this is because women often work fewer hours than men, men and women select different jobs, women take more time off work, women are more likely to take time off to care for family, etc. Essentially, critics say that comparisons of the pay that men receive versus the pay that women receive are apples to oranges comparisons because of the different ways that men and women "approach" (for lack of a better word) the labor force.
Are these criticisms valid?
Right now, if I understand correctly, women are said to earn roughly seventy-six cents for every dollar a man makes. Obviously, this generates contempt amongst the feminist community. However, some critics argue that feminists who lament this pay gap aren't considering all the factors. For example, they say that this is because women often work fewer hours than men, men and women select different jobs, women take more time off work, women are more likely to take time off to care for family, etc. Essentially, critics say that comparisons of the pay that men receive versus the pay that women receive are apples to oranges comparisons because of the different ways that men and women "approach" (for lack of a better word) the labor force.
Are these criticisms valid?
Comment