very touchy Subject 7 year old raped

[Kimmik]

Story here

I think the men should be castrated and the "sister" should be tried as an adult sex offender. What that girl did to that poor child. Where were the Parents...

my god this makes me a paranoid mommy. what the hell is wrong with people today... I normally dont think the death penalty is right but damn it cases like this... really make me question my beliefs.

[Peppergirl]

Absolutely disgusting.

The sad part is, I'm sure someone will come along and say 'oh, it wasn't so bad'.

*waits*

[Skelly]

Castrated? Just kill them all, in a swift and effecient manner. Problem solved.

[Lace Neil Singer]

Castration does not stop a man from being able to commit a sexual assault on a child. Seeing as rape and sexual abuse are commonly to do with exercising power and controlling the victim rather than sexual desire, the idea that castrating a child rapist will instantly "fix" him doesn't make sense. Besides, there are other ways to commit sexual assault than the obvious; women can also be abusers, as can impotant men, for example, Andrei Chikatilo. Some rapists use objects, such as sex toys, on their victims. Therefore, castration as a means of preventing sexual assault is a pipe dream.

[Plaidman]

Death is easier and faster. I've known molesters who would use a coat hanger instead of his to shove up butts. So no, just losing a dick won't stop them.


My god... I just read that story. That... that bitch. Her little step sister followed her to a party, because the little girl was scared for her step sister's safely. Only to have her own sister sell her her to be gang-raped.

What the.

I mean WHAT THE FUCK!?

[Kimmik]

Lace I know that it is a pipe dream.. also considering you can castrate female offenders... as a child that went through some horrors.. and doesn't believe in the death penalty.. my dream was to send them to a camp in the middle of bfe and used as medical test subjects.

[Lace Neil Singer]

I'd be a bit wary of doing that, seeing as the Nazis carried out similar things. For example, on Bruno Ludke, who's guilt is now in doubt.

My personal wish is that they be put down, just like vicious dogs or man eating tigers would be. They can't be cured from their pedophilia, and there's a chance they could be released from secure units. Obviously, I am thinking of the English execution method, without lengthy appeals and stays in the condemned cell.

Of course, this applies to those who's guilt has been proved without a doubt. Even the slightest bit of doubt would be enough to impose a life sentence; however, life should mean life and not just "serve ten years then get out on parole".

[powerboy]

How can anyone do that? They should all be killed.

[blas87]

If less people believed in "curing" these sick fucks, we could kill them. We'd also have a lot less dead children and emotionally scarred for life children.

[Peppergirl]

If less people believed in "curing" these sick fucks, we could kill them. We'd also have a lot less dead children and emotionally scarred for life children.

This.

1000 times over. This.

[lobo94]

People are sick.

[Jester]

Just kill them all, in a swift and effecient manner.

Give me a locked room, a loaded Luger, an extra magazine, the offenders duct-taped to their chairs, and fifteen minutes.

Efficient, brutal, and effective. Problem not solved....problem eliminated.

Castration does not stop a man from being able to commit a sexual assault on a child.

...women can also be abusers, as can impotant men, for example, Andrei Chikatilo.

Impotence has nothing to do with castration.

Castration is removal of the testicles, the main produce of testosterone in the body. One can be impotent and full of testosterone, and thus sexual desire.

So one cannot say that castration will not stop someone because impotence does not. The two are not related.

So no, just losing a dick won't stop them.

Again, castration is removal of the testicles. NOT the penis. Although without the the testicles, it is far more unlikely that the offender will have as much sexual drive, or the ability to get much of an erection.

But castration is not removal of the penis. A common misconception, I'm afraid.

[Lace Neil Singer]

As I said before, rape isn't about sexual desire, it's about the exercise of POWER. So therefore, a child rapist wouldn't have to have sexual desire to get the urge to abuse a child; and he or SHE could use other ways to perform the abuse.

[Plaidman]

Again, castration is removal of the testicles. NOT the penis. Although without the the testicles, it is far more unlikely that the offender will have as much sexual drive, or the ability to get much of an erection.

But castration is not removal of the penis. A common misconception, I'm afraid.

I do know what castration is and means. But I am pointing out that even if one doesn't have a penis, they will still find ways to sexually abuse.

[Nyoibo]

As I said before, rape isn't about sexual desire, it's about the exercise of POWER. So therefore, a child rapist wouldn't have to have sexual desire to get the urge to abuse a child; and he or SHE could use other ways to perform the abuse.

Yes and no, a child rapist is called such because sex with a minor is statutory rape, however pedophilia and sex with children is more about desire and gratification than power.