Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

dressed for...something?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by telecom_goddess View Post
    As for the belt thing I'm confused...how is it backwards? As long as the buckle is in front that's what matters right?

    I don't get it ether. Apprently the buckle has to be on left side or something. I thought as long as the buckle is on front, that yeah, its fine. But nope.


    But seriously, if a girl is so gung ho on looks, my belt isn't going to be the part she gets ug about, its my eyes.

    Why would I want a girl like that anyway? Clothes ae clothes, not the be all end all of a person's worth.
    Toilet Paper has been "bath tissue" for the longest time, and it really chaps my ass - Blas
    I AM THE MAN of the house! I wear the pants!!! But uh...my wife buys the pants so....yeah.

    Comment


    • #47
      ...that reminds me, I need to go watch The Big Lebowski.
      "I take it your health insurance doesn't cover acts of pussy."

      Comment


      • #48
        For classes, there is one reason why someone might be wearing sweat pants or pj pants that I completely forgot about. What if a student had some type of P.E. class right before the next class and didn't have the time to change? I dunno if any other colleges make their students do a P.E. class, but we have to do a specific P.E. class and then have to pick one other one out of the many many choices we have.
        "It's after Jeopardy, so it is my bed time."- Me when someone made a joke about how "old" I am.

        Comment


        • #49
          I've been noticing this sort of thing in the library more often..........pajama bottoms seem to be one of the "in" things for younger women to wear, although I don't see too many wearing their bedroom slippers as well.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by McDreidel09 View Post
            What if a student had some type of P.E. class right before the next class and didn't have the time to change?
            Most of my acting/movement classes required gym wear, that is, sweatpants or shorts, t-shirts, and tennis shoes/bare feet. If we had shown up in pajama pants, we wouldn't have been able to participate. PJ pants aren't good for exercise since they are usually made out of dense cotton or flannel, are loose/baggy, and are usually hanging on by a drawstring. I wouldn't blink about a student in my class in gym/yoga pants, something like that. BUT, students should also think about their classes as they are scheduling them. I can't tell you how many students think they should be able to walk into my class 10 minutes late because they didn't think about how far apart the buildings on campus are.

            Comment


            • #51
              OH GOD MY EYES!!!!!!!!

              I was at a one of those clothing stores that specializes in funny tshirts and such, I saw a Onesie that had "5$ Foot Long" with an arrow pointing down seriously if I ever see that on a child I will be sorely tempted to smack the parent and call CPS.
              Jack Faire
              Friend
              Father
              Smartass

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by KellyHabersham View Post
                I've been noticing this sort of thing in the library more often..........pajama bottoms seem to be one of the "in" things for younger women to wear, although I don't see too many wearing their bedroom slippers as well.
                A girl came into the petrol station today in jammies and bedroom slippers. O_o
                "Oh wow, I can't believe how stupid I used to be and you still are."

                Comment


                • #53
                  What about people who just step outside in their PJs? Like to get the paper or call the dog in. Some days when you're going to stay home anyone, you don't feel like getting dressed. Why should they do that for a 30 second trip outside, if that?

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Rageaholic View Post
                    What about people who just step outside in their PJs? Like to get the paper or call the dog in. Some days when you're going to stay home anyone, you don't feel like getting dressed. Why should they do that for a 30 second trip outside, if that?
                    That's not what we're discussing at all. That scenario is irrelevant to the discussion.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      hobbs, you're my favorite ^_^

                      here's another thing that totally baffles me...the people that go out with pants below the bum, boxers showing, and walking like a penguin just to keep their pants from falling to the ground. what sense does that make?
                      there's a difference between "baggy" and "swimming in your clothes." what plaid does (i'm guessing) is baggy, and that's fine. but...tshirts down to the knees? what?

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        I agree, Green Fairy..to me the whole "pants below the butt where the underwear shows" is so unattractive. More so when the pants are tight, and we get treated to a nice show of stained boxers/ briefs . I don't see why anyone would think that the general public would want to be subjected to something like that. To answer the question, I do not think going out in public in pajamas is acceptable, because it just looks sloppy, and to echo the sentiments of some here, it takes like two seconds to put on a clean pair of jeans and a t-shirt. (sorry for the novel )

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          In my area it seems the guys that sag have taken to wearing basketball shorts under their jeans so that they are showing bball shorts instead of undies. I don't know if this is because of the schools or what but still seems ridiculous to me.

                          On the other hand skinny jeans are also omg wtf to me.
                          Jack Faire
                          Friend
                          Father
                          Smartass

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Green_Fairy View Post
                            hobbs, you're my favorite ^_^

                            here's another thing that totally baffles me...the people that go out with pants below the bum, boxers showing, and walking like a penguin just to keep their pants from falling to the ground. what sense does that make?
                            there's a difference between "baggy" and "swimming in your clothes." what plaid does (i'm guessing) is baggy, and that's fine. but...tshirts down to the knees? what?
                            *tips hat* Just part o' the job, ma'am >_^

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              On the other hand skinny jeans are also omg wtf to me.
                              Ack, I do not understand skinny jeans on guys. Women sure. But it seems like they'd be particularly, uh, cramped on guys from what I've seen (which is sometimes more than I should be seeing through pants... ick)

                              I was reading a blog recently and they posted these http://www.asos.com/What-Goes-Around...t=-1&clr=Multi

                              (sorry about the long link) These are being sold as pants. I believe there are other things in that line like that too. Just thought it was interesting.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by muses_nightmare View Post
                                Ack, I do not understand skinny jeans on guys. Women sure. But it seems like they'd be particularly, uh, cramped on guys from what I've seen (which is sometimes more than I should be seeing through pants... ick)
                                oooooh skinny jeans...i could go on and on about those damned things. they are a privilege, not a right. i see rather...*ahem* large women wearing those things. large guys, too. no! bad fashion victims! those things shouldn't come in sizes that large. i know for a fact that there are ways to dress larger body types in a way that does not include skinny jeans and looks so much better than that. skinny jeans should be reserved for i dunno...skinny people? like the ones that are a size 5 or lower. hell, i'm a size 7 and i don't even wear the damned things. yanno why? because i know i'd look like shite in them ('sides, my ass is too big). freaking hate those things so freaking much i want to rip them off of the people i see them in.
                                that and spandex. hate it when people wear leggings as pants. sure, i'll wear leggings...under a skirt. but when people wear them with just a t-shirt? gaaaaaah!!! *twitch*

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X