Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Boy Suspended Over Rosery Beads.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    The school is not banning the beads in this case.
    They aren't even banning the rosary.

    The student was not suspended for wearing the rosary. He was suspended for refusing to wear it under his shirt during school hours.

    They are simply asking students to keep the beads covered up during school hours to prevent possible violence related to misunderstandings and assumptions that the beads are being worn for gang related purposes.

    Schools are allowed to set dress codes.
    In this case, they have focused on the use of beads by gangs.

    This isn't just something the school board has done on a whim.

    Gang violence is a prevalent and serious problem across the nation, and this particular area, Schnectady, NY, is no exception.

    Children are dying due to gang related violence.
    There have been cases of students shot down or knifed because they were wearing something that was thought to be gang related, only to find out later that it was a mistaken impression.

    It may seem like overreaction and obsessive, and ridiculous, and there may be fears of "what next?" but erring on the side of caution to prevent violence and death on school property seems like good idea to me.

    Temporarily putting your rosary under your shirt during school hours seems like a small price to pay.

    Schools can't start making exceptions for one student.

    Just because this boy is wearing his rosary in memory of dead relatives, the school can't say, "Oh, in that case go ahead," and then turn around and tell another kid, "Sorry, we know you have gang affiliations, so you have to cover up your rosary."
    Point to Ponder:

    Is it considered irony when someone on an internet forum makes a post that can be considered to look like it was written by a 3rd grade dropout, and they are poking fun of the fact that another person couldn't spell?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Ree View Post
      Gang violence is a prevalent and serious problem across the nation, and this particular area, Schnectady, NY, is no exception.

      Children are dying due to gang related violence.
      There have been cases of students shot down or knifed because they were wearing something that was thought to be gang related, only to find out later that it was a mistaken impression.
      Ree, I hear ya. Contrary to popular beliefs, violence can, and does happen everywhere. Up until recently, where I live, gangs were thought of as an "inner city" problem. That is, until several fights broke out in the next 'burb over. Two groups of suburban white kids wanted to emulate the idiots in the inner city by forming gangs. All of that ended...after they'd roughed up several people (who weren't even *in* either gang) for simply wearing the 'wrong' colors in there respective areas In fact, even in the inner city, you couldn't wear certain colors. To do so, you'd risk your life.

      And yes, I remember the gang wars of the early 1990s here. It seemed that someone was getting shot nearly every night then. Things have calmed down somewhat--most of idiots are either in jail or dead now. Even in the late 1990s, you could hear gunshots at night in certain areas...and many sections of town would set the traffic lights to "all green" at night so you didn't have to stop because of carjackings. But, even now, schools will still bust students for wearing certain colors (usually blue or red scarves), and have been known to bust them for making threats.

      Stupid? Probably not. Unfortunately, the schools have to do something. If they don't, and violence happens, who gets blamed for it? 99.9% of the time, the school officials will get raked over the coals for "not doing anything to stop it." Yet, when they do something, like banning beads or colors, people bitch about how "strict" they're being. Sorry, but banning gang symbols is a small price to pay for someone not getting hurt!

      Comment


      • #18
        As it's been astutely pointed out, he wasn't even asked to removed the beads. He was asked to tuck them under his shirt. Hardly a major offense. If it's gang related, it's gang related. It's better than him getting stabbed or shot because of wearing the wrong colors.
        Violence has resolved more conflicts than anything else. The contrary opinion that violence doesn't solve anything is merely wishful thinking at its worst. - Starship Troopers

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Ree View Post
          This thing of wearing the rosary is a new concept for me. Is it a cultural thing?
          I was raised with the idea that my rosary was for praying, and not for decoration. In fact, wearing the rosary as jewellery was considered sacrilegious.
          It's a Hispanic custom, yes.
          Bartle Test Results: E.S.A.K.
          Explorer: 93%, Socializer: 60%, Achiever: 40%, Killer: 13%

          Comment


          • #20
            OK, I'd never thought about it that way around before. If instead of "you can't wear that because it means you might be in a gang, and we don't want anyone to find out" it's "you can't wear that because someone might think you're in the wrong gang and harm you," that's different!
            "My in-laws are country people and at night you can hear their distinctive howl."

            Comment


            • #21
              I'm not saying he was right about not following school rules. All I was pointing out was that his wearing the rosary was not religious. He absolutely should have tucked his beads in his shirt, since it is according to the rules of the school.
              "It's after Jeopardy, so it is my bed time."- Me when someone made a joke about how "old" I am.

              Comment


              • #22
                Also no one in a gang is going to say, "Oh sorry yeah I am wearing my rosary because I am in a gang so you should let me wear them" Instead they would have a "reason" for wearing them.
                Jack Faire
                Friend
                Father
                Smartass

                Comment


                • #23
                  This is a battle schools will never win unless they develop a dress code so strict that it involves exactly how someone's hair is to be styled and what jewelry is allowed. Otherwise, some overly paranoid administrator is going to associate anything and everything with gang activity.

                  Even then, what happens when a local gang happens to use the same colors as the school uniform?

                  Are they going to eliminate sign-language because someone may inadvertently start flashing gang signs?

                  It's all recockulous if you ask me.

                  CH
                  Some People Are Alive Only Because It's Illegal To Kill Them.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    It's one thing for a "paranoid administrator" to decide something must be a gang symbol and a completely different thing for the gang to actually use something as a gang symbol.

                    Religious symbols, rosaries, crosses, bibles, etc have been used as gang symbols for years because it is hard to ban those things due to the large amount of christians in this country. Meaning you could conduct gang activity with impunity.
                    Jack Faire
                    Friend
                    Father
                    Smartass

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I'm wondering if the boy's final comment is true; where he said that there are other people with more obvious gang signs who get left alone. This sounds typical of a school.

                      My take on it is that the school has to look like they give a crap about gang symbols, but seriously, do you wanna go tell a gigantic black dude who's probably armed to the teeth that he can't wear his gang sign? I sure as hell don't. But if I were at that school I would have to make it look like I was really enforcing the rule, so I'm gonna go pick out little boy blue and find something wrong - if it wasn't the beads it'd be something else. This way no one can say "Hey, you're not enforcing the rules." Of course I am, but I'm taking the easy way out, going through the motions just for show. Same as I expect this school is handling it.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Most schools do take gang activity seriously, even the most brutal gang won't bother going after the school administrator who kicked them out of the place they don't want to go. Its possible if the boy is telling the truth that he is aware of a new sign the administration hasn't caught wind of yet. Officials are after all typically three steps behind of everybody else.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by joe hx View Post
                          When I was in public school, if the school didn't like something, they just had to say it was "gang related" and they could ban it.

                          Tatoos? gang related.
                          Scars? gang relared.
                          Lanyards? gang related.
                          Yo-yos? Gang related
                          Sunglasses? gang related.
                          Unnatural hair colors? gang related
                          those weird contacts? gang related

                          Yes, some of it is gang related. But yo-yos?
                          Scars? How the hell do you ban scars?
                          I'm liberal on some issues and conservative on others. For example, I would not burn a flag, but neither would I put one out. -Garry Shandling

                          You can't believe in something you don't. -Ricky Gervais

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by BookstoreEscapee View Post
                            Scars? How the hell do you ban scars?
                            By kicking out everyone who has a scar! ZERO TOLERANCE!!!11!!!
                            All units: IRENE
                            HK MP5-N: Solving 800 problems a minute since 1986

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Or maybe preventing people from carving stuff into their arm with a paper clip.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                It seems to me its a case of the kid refusing to follow a rule he doesn't understand. And in this case, its very possible that he was completely innocent. His rosary beads were just rosary beads. He didn't understand why he had to hide it, because to him it was something deeply related to someone close to him. This relationship with the beads made it seem ridiculous to him that he would get in trouble for honoring his loved one's memories.

                                At my school, there was a big protest because long umbrellas were banned. It seems reasonable to protest, but they weren't banned until after a student hit the principal with one.

                                Originally posted by Red Panda View Post
                                Or maybe preventing people from carving stuff into their arm with a paper clip.
                                Some people like to hurt themselves. Some people are more creative about it than others. Those people need help, not to get in trouble. I'm not saying it can't be related to gangs. I'm just saying it seems important to avoid throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
                                "Nam castum esse decet pium poetam
                                ipsum, versiculos nihil necessest"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X