From a thread about meth in Customers Suck (Sightings):
Think about the serious mental illnesses. Think about people who hallucinate vividly all the time. People whose brains are physically or chemically screwed up, and can't 'just cheer up'. People who can't stop thinking long enough to sleep. People who are constantly jittery-active. Constantly paranoid. Constantly - well, whatever.
Now suppose you've found that when you take something - beer, marijuana, heroin, cocaine, meth, whatever - you can actually sort of think straight. Or the visions stop. Or the paranoia stops. Or you can sleep.
It's the best you've ever found.
Or maybe it's more affordable than the prescription drugs.
Or maybe you can't get psychiatric treatment because you can't work because you're sick and without work you can't get health insurance and without insurance you can't get treatment. And because you can't get treatment, street drugs are all that's available.
Sure, a percentage (an unknown-to-me percentage) of drug addicts are addicts for recreational reasons.
But a percentage of them (another unknown-to-me percentage) are on street drugs to try to silence the voices or otherwise treat a physically or chemically disordered brain.
And another percentage are on drugs because of an intolerable life, or because of earlier trauma, or some other functional (not physical or chemical) psychiatric illness.
I have little sympathy for those who got addicted purely recreationally. But those for whom it's a grasping-at-straws attempt to cope with the impossible, I do have sympathy for. And my solution is predictable: affordable medical treatment for all. In this case, the medical treatment needs to be backed up by social workers.
Psychiatric screening through the teenage years, and affordable treatment for psychiatric illness, would (IMO) reduce drug addiction by almost the entire percentage of addicts who are addicts because of psychiatric illness. Well, it would by the time the current addicts died off, anyway. A more expensive program would redirect current addicts to the psychiatric sphere for detoxing, diagnosis and treatment.
But think of the savings in crime-related costs alone! Not to mention the savings in locating, demolishing and rebuilding meth lab houses.
Think about the serious mental illnesses. Think about people who hallucinate vividly all the time. People whose brains are physically or chemically screwed up, and can't 'just cheer up'. People who can't stop thinking long enough to sleep. People who are constantly jittery-active. Constantly paranoid. Constantly - well, whatever.
Now suppose you've found that when you take something - beer, marijuana, heroin, cocaine, meth, whatever - you can actually sort of think straight. Or the visions stop. Or the paranoia stops. Or you can sleep.
It's the best you've ever found.
Or maybe it's more affordable than the prescription drugs.
Or maybe you can't get psychiatric treatment because you can't work because you're sick and without work you can't get health insurance and without insurance you can't get treatment. And because you can't get treatment, street drugs are all that's available.
Sure, a percentage (an unknown-to-me percentage) of drug addicts are addicts for recreational reasons.
But a percentage of them (another unknown-to-me percentage) are on street drugs to try to silence the voices or otherwise treat a physically or chemically disordered brain.
And another percentage are on drugs because of an intolerable life, or because of earlier trauma, or some other functional (not physical or chemical) psychiatric illness.
I have little sympathy for those who got addicted purely recreationally. But those for whom it's a grasping-at-straws attempt to cope with the impossible, I do have sympathy for. And my solution is predictable: affordable medical treatment for all. In this case, the medical treatment needs to be backed up by social workers.
Psychiatric screening through the teenage years, and affordable treatment for psychiatric illness, would (IMO) reduce drug addiction by almost the entire percentage of addicts who are addicts because of psychiatric illness. Well, it would by the time the current addicts died off, anyway. A more expensive program would redirect current addicts to the psychiatric sphere for detoxing, diagnosis and treatment.
But think of the savings in crime-related costs alone! Not to mention the savings in locating, demolishing and rebuilding meth lab houses.
Comment