I'll admit, I used to scoff at anything that could be considered PC. However, over the years I've softened my position somewhat, though I still find some of it to be silly.
For example, a few years ago I worked at a camp for disabled children and adults. During the training week, they went over a list of ways of referring to certain phenomena we would be encountering during our time there, and this list provided "preferred terms" for these phenomena. For example, if a camper used a bib, we were encouraged to called it a "clothing cover" instead of a "bib." Likewise, we were to refer to "diapers" as "undergarments" (especially for older campers). Also, instead of saying that a person was "confined to a wheelchair," we were to say that the person "used a wheelchair to get around," and instead of saying that a person was "retarded," we were to say that the person "lived with mental retardation." There were others, but those are the only ones I can remember at the moment.
When I was going through this training, I actually was able to see a lot of sense in what was being taught, and whenever accusations of PC fanaticism are thrown around, I stop and think about this. To me, it seems that a nice "middle of the road" approach is best in this case. To some extent, I think we can be careful about how we word things so as to not be offensive. However, there is a deep end that many people go over, and it brings them to the point where a lot of innocuous things are made to be targets of outrage.
For example, a few years ago I worked at a camp for disabled children and adults. During the training week, they went over a list of ways of referring to certain phenomena we would be encountering during our time there, and this list provided "preferred terms" for these phenomena. For example, if a camper used a bib, we were encouraged to called it a "clothing cover" instead of a "bib." Likewise, we were to refer to "diapers" as "undergarments" (especially for older campers). Also, instead of saying that a person was "confined to a wheelchair," we were to say that the person "used a wheelchair to get around," and instead of saying that a person was "retarded," we were to say that the person "lived with mental retardation." There were others, but those are the only ones I can remember at the moment.
When I was going through this training, I actually was able to see a lot of sense in what was being taught, and whenever accusations of PC fanaticism are thrown around, I stop and think about this. To me, it seems that a nice "middle of the road" approach is best in this case. To some extent, I think we can be careful about how we word things so as to not be offensive. However, there is a deep end that many people go over, and it brings them to the point where a lot of innocuous things are made to be targets of outrage.
Comment