Hope she loses her daughter forever.

[Plaidman]

http://www.kgw.com/news/local/Police...-99991239.html

Man sexually abuses seven year old daughter.

This naturally causes said daughter's mother to fall in love with man and marry him.

Police are after him. She refuses to help. She's in trouble for tampering with witness, hiding information, and various others.

I hope she loses her daughter forever, and he gets slammed by multiple cars that only leave him enough to be in burning angony, along with much prison sexual abuse himself.

[kiwi]

The Mother married him not the daughter (I guess that was a typo in the OP)

Disgusting either way, totally shameful. There is a special place in hell for people like that

[Mongo Skruddgemire]

Don't be too hard on the mother. This is Stockholm Syndrome at its most classic.

I still think that the daughter needs to be removed from the mothers care, but the mother was damaged emotionally from the abuse. She needs help more than she needs condemnation to Hell for her actions.

The removal of the daughter needs to be for her safety since the mother no longer can see that her husband has done wrong. It should not be for punitive reasons.

[Plaidman]

How does man abuse daughter equate to "OMG! I LOVE THIS MAN! He rapes my daughter! I need to marry him, like, NOW! even if he'll never touch me, and just fuck my daughter every night!" in her mind? It doesn't. She's nothing more then garbage who treats her daughter like shit for no reason.
She doesn't deserve to be a mother.

I'd be far far more leninet if she didn't know, and was willing to work with police to protect her daughter. Instead, she decides to help him, rather then protect her child.

[Mongo Skruddgemire]

I'd be far far more leninet if she didn't know, and was willing to work with police to protect her daughter. Instead, she decides to help him, rather then protect her child.

I'm not saying be lenient on the mother. I'm just saying understand where some of this comes from.

You don't hate the rabid animal, but you still have to take it out behind the woodshed with a double-barreled shotgun and blow it away.

In this case I don't hate the mother since I understand what Stockholm Syndrome can do to a person emotionally, but I still want the daughter taken away before *she* gets screwed up in the head and the mother taken off to prison or what would be better still...a mental institution where she can get help getting her sanity chip screwed back in.

[draggar]

This is exactly what happened in the movie "Precious".

Clearly she was brainwashed to think he wasn't hurting her daughter. She needs an educational kick in the ass.

[BlaqueKatt]

Don't be too hard on the mother. This is Stockholm Syndrome at its most classic.

I still think that the daughter needs to be removed from the mothers care, but the mother was damaged emotionally from the abuse.

there is no mention of any form of abuse to anyone but the child-she married him 2 hours after he was indicted on 45 counts of child sexual abuse-and brought the child along-you keep using the phrase "Stockholm syndrome"-I do not think that term means what you think it does.....

[Hobbs]

there is no mention of any form of abuse to anyone but the child-she married him 2 hours after he was indicted on 45 counts of child sexual abuse-and brought the child along-you keep using the phrase "Stockholm syndrome"-I do not think that term means what you think it does.....

Keep using? He used it once. I do not think that phrase means what you think it means.

The article is very curt. Without further evidence, there's nothing to say she was or wasn't suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. The disorder/behavior itself could be used to describe her actions, although Battered Wife Syndrome is probably the domestic-abuse equivalent.

[kibbles]

Why is it when a woman does something awful like refusing to protect her daughter, there are excuses made for the that woman, but if the situations were reversed than the man would be condemned?

I understand where Plaid is coming from IMO.

[blas87]

kibbles, I am against that woman through and through. I agree with another poster, this sounds like the movie Precious. Women like her don't deserve excuses.

Sad. Really sad.

[kibbles]

Thank blas, I agree with you too 100000% Hopefully the one who will be given the help is the poor child who has suffered.

[BlaqueKatt]

Keep using? He used it once. I do not think that phrase means what you think it means.

I count two posts defending her via "stockholm syndrome"

This is Stockholm Syndrome at its most classic.

In this case I don't hate the mother since I understand what Stockholm Syndrome can do to a person

with no mention of abuse of the mother-instantly jumping to "it's not her fault-stockholm syndrome"

this article has more info including: He fled when the investigation started, they got married after the indictment(spouses cannot be compelled to testify against each other-how convenient )AFTER he had been gone for 3 months remember "Stockholm syndrome requires , four things as it's foundation-

* The presence of a perceived threat to one's physical or psychological survival and the belief that the abuser would carry out the threat
* The presence of a perceived small kindness from the abuser to the victim
* Isolation from perspectives other than those of the abuser
* The perceived inability to escape the situation

the last two do not apply, as he fled and was not around for 3 months prior-no news story thus far has brought up any mention of abuse so assuming "the mother must be an abuse victim" is hogwash(also means the first condition may not apply either)-some women can be evil and can abuse their own children without having a "man around to beat them into doing it". Sadly this mindset of the general public allows abusive women the ability to continue abusive behavior and not get called on it-"the ebil man made me do it I swear, I'm a woman, fragile and weak don't blame me for my actions".
Yup we're equal unless something bad happens then, blame the man because "obviously women aren't capable of that"

Armchair psychology is rampant, and does nothing to help real sufferers of mental disorders. And before you even ask, yes I have been in more than one abusive relationship, guess what, it wasn't the "evil man's" fault for anything I did-it was mine-I dealt with the consequences of my actions/decisions-no one gets a "free pass" to harm another human being or animal.




Also the charges against him are: 13 counts of using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct, eight counts of first-degree encouraging child sexual abuse, one count of first-degree attempted sexual abuse and 23 counts of second-degree encouraging child sexual abuse.

SO if he's only charged with encouraging child sexual abuse, who was actually abusing the child?

[Plaidman]

....

Her.

....

Guess he wanted to view it as a twosome.

No wonder she doesn't want to go against him, and is trying to keep her daughter.

[Hobbs]

I count two posts defending her via "stockholm syndrome"

You were addressing a single individual. Two people used the same term. That does not mean that the same person continuously referred to Stockholm Syndrome.

He fled when the investigation started, they got married after the indictment(spouses cannot be compelled to testify against each other-how convenient )

Now, that I see more as a ploy from the man for using a legal loophole.

Armchair psychology is rampant, and does nothing to help real sufferers of mental disorders.

Yes, it is.

[BlaqueKatt]

You were addressing a single individual. Two people used the same term.

so two posts by mongo Skruddgemire is two people using the term? since when?-both that I quoted were posted by mongo, not two separate posters both claiming the mom obviously has stockholm syndrome-so yes he used the term twice in two separate posts-