...even when parents call in for their child?
My SIL's son (my nephew, D) is in 2nd grade this year. She and I were talking about them coming to see us sometime early next year, when she mentioned that she would have to come up with some excuse like a relative died in order to get D out of school. I asked what she meant, and she said that all absences a child has during the school year are unexcused, unless it's due to illness or death in the family, and even with illness, the school needs a dr. note in order to change it from unexcused to excused. Even if the student only misses one day due to illness, and even if the illness is something like the common cold, which going to a dr. for won't help anyway.
I don't know what the difference between unexcused and excused absences are exactly, but I'm sure the student gets reprimanded for having too many (or even any) unexcused absences; probably detention of some sort, at the very least.
This just strikes me as ridiculous. Even if the parent calls in and says, "Little Johnny is not feeling well today so I am going to keep him home" the school needs a dr. note or it's unexcused. Even if a parent contacts the teacher and says, "We are going out of town in 3 weeks for a long weekend so Little Jonny is going to miss class on that Friday" it's unexcused because it's not due to illness or death in the family.
Seriously? When I was in school, my parents pulled me all the time to go on trips and family functions. Sometimes for a day or half a day on a Friday to go somewhere for a long weekend, sometimes for a week (or more) when we went to Arizona to visit my grandparents. My parents always let the school know in advance and the school was fine with it. I'd get homework and reading assignments from the teacher before I left and do it while we were gone.
I realize kids today probably skip school a lot more than they did when I was in school, but I still think it's ridiculous that a parent can call in for their child and say they're ill and the school will still mark it as unexcused. Or, in this case, my SIL has to make a 8-9 hour trip one way to drive to us, so it's not like she can just come for a weekend. Yes, there are the usual school vacations like Christmas and Spring breaks, but those don't necessarily line up with her work schedule or our's. Plus there is going to be a play coming to our city in the middle of February that she really wants to see and bring D to, that falls around no school breaks.
Is this the norm these days? All unexcused absences except in extreme circumstances?
My SIL's son (my nephew, D) is in 2nd grade this year. She and I were talking about them coming to see us sometime early next year, when she mentioned that she would have to come up with some excuse like a relative died in order to get D out of school. I asked what she meant, and she said that all absences a child has during the school year are unexcused, unless it's due to illness or death in the family, and even with illness, the school needs a dr. note in order to change it from unexcused to excused. Even if the student only misses one day due to illness, and even if the illness is something like the common cold, which going to a dr. for won't help anyway.
I don't know what the difference between unexcused and excused absences are exactly, but I'm sure the student gets reprimanded for having too many (or even any) unexcused absences; probably detention of some sort, at the very least.
This just strikes me as ridiculous. Even if the parent calls in and says, "Little Johnny is not feeling well today so I am going to keep him home" the school needs a dr. note or it's unexcused. Even if a parent contacts the teacher and says, "We are going out of town in 3 weeks for a long weekend so Little Jonny is going to miss class on that Friday" it's unexcused because it's not due to illness or death in the family.
Seriously? When I was in school, my parents pulled me all the time to go on trips and family functions. Sometimes for a day or half a day on a Friday to go somewhere for a long weekend, sometimes for a week (or more) when we went to Arizona to visit my grandparents. My parents always let the school know in advance and the school was fine with it. I'd get homework and reading assignments from the teacher before I left and do it while we were gone.
I realize kids today probably skip school a lot more than they did when I was in school, but I still think it's ridiculous that a parent can call in for their child and say they're ill and the school will still mark it as unexcused. Or, in this case, my SIL has to make a 8-9 hour trip one way to drive to us, so it's not like she can just come for a weekend. Yes, there are the usual school vacations like Christmas and Spring breaks, but those don't necessarily line up with her work schedule or our's. Plus there is going to be a play coming to our city in the middle of February that she really wants to see and bring D to, that falls around no school breaks.
Is this the norm these days? All unexcused absences except in extreme circumstances?
Comment