I support it...
...in cases where it's proven beyond all doubt that the perp did it, and only in cases where violence applies (rape, murder, terrorism). In those cases, I think the death penalty should not only be applicable but put to good use.
Frankly, I have no sympathy for a piece of shit that thinks it's fun to rape and/or murder (often repeatedly). These kind are a danger to everyone else and they have nothing worthwhile to offer in permanent incarceration. Get rid of 'em, I say. You'll save on the tax dollars it costs to house and feed them too.
Revenge? Maybe. Certainly, it won't undo the damage already done. But I think true (and fitting) revenge would be for the perp to suffer and die exactly in the same manner as what he did to his victims. I don't buy the excuse that lethal injection or other such is "cruel and unusual" - How about people who suffered under brutal sexual assault, or were set on fire, or literally cut into pieces *while they were still conscious*? How about a young New York woman who was kidnapped, raped, choked and had her head wrapped in plastic wrap so she suffocated and was then thrown off a bridge? (True case; happened in 2006) You gonna tell me THAT'S not cruel and unusual?
And yes, if God forbid I or a loved one was the victim of such a horrendous crime, I'd want the perp dead. Why should that scumbag get to breathe air when we've been denied it?
One of the things I dislike about my home state is that Illinois enacted a moratorium on executions, thanks to former governor George Ryan (who, I might add, is now serving a prison sentence on corruption charges). I guarantee you Ryan didn't have any change of conscience when he pushed that bullshit measure through; he did it solely to make himself look good. (Ryan's on record as being one of the worst governors in IL for scandal)
I don't know whether or not the death penalty deters crime, but it would sure cut down on the number of scumbags taking up space in prison.
...in cases where it's proven beyond all doubt that the perp did it, and only in cases where violence applies (rape, murder, terrorism). In those cases, I think the death penalty should not only be applicable but put to good use.
Frankly, I have no sympathy for a piece of shit that thinks it's fun to rape and/or murder (often repeatedly). These kind are a danger to everyone else and they have nothing worthwhile to offer in permanent incarceration. Get rid of 'em, I say. You'll save on the tax dollars it costs to house and feed them too.
Revenge? Maybe. Certainly, it won't undo the damage already done. But I think true (and fitting) revenge would be for the perp to suffer and die exactly in the same manner as what he did to his victims. I don't buy the excuse that lethal injection or other such is "cruel and unusual" - How about people who suffered under brutal sexual assault, or were set on fire, or literally cut into pieces *while they were still conscious*? How about a young New York woman who was kidnapped, raped, choked and had her head wrapped in plastic wrap so she suffocated and was then thrown off a bridge? (True case; happened in 2006) You gonna tell me THAT'S not cruel and unusual?
And yes, if God forbid I or a loved one was the victim of such a horrendous crime, I'd want the perp dead. Why should that scumbag get to breathe air when we've been denied it?
One of the things I dislike about my home state is that Illinois enacted a moratorium on executions, thanks to former governor George Ryan (who, I might add, is now serving a prison sentence on corruption charges). I guarantee you Ryan didn't have any change of conscience when he pushed that bullshit measure through; he did it solely to make himself look good. (Ryan's on record as being one of the worst governors in IL for scandal)
I don't know whether or not the death penalty deters crime, but it would sure cut down on the number of scumbags taking up space in prison.
Comment