Well, I would argue that nobody has any business keeping their child locked up in a kennel until its cheese starts slipping off its cracker, either.
As for dangerous dogs, what people don't understand is that "dangerous" does not always mean "vicious." The sweetest dog in the world can still be to some extent dangerous when it is of a breed that has been bred to have a particularly damage-inflicting bite.
A Rotties and Pits are such breeds. Most of the pits I know are actually very sweet tempered, easygoing dogs. And I still don't want my child around them because they have a dangerous bite. All dogs, from teacup size ones to Wolfhounds will bite. ALL of them. No exceptions. However, some dogs, when they do bite, have devastating bite patterns. It's just not worth the risk to me.
People who say "oh, I don't have to have my dog in a fence or on a leash because he would NEVER bite anyone" are dangerously naive. Yes, he might. He's a dog, not a person. Do not do the dog a disservice by trying to anthromorphize his thought processes. Couple that with a dog that has the sort of bite pattern that can take someone's face off, and there's a problem.
And then, of course, you have the problem of people deliberately getting "dangerous" dogs because they have this stupid macho thing going on and encouraging the dog to be vicious (which is probably more accurately described as "constantly frightened"). So now we have a dangerous dog that is ALSO a vicious dog.
As for dangerous dogs, what people don't understand is that "dangerous" does not always mean "vicious." The sweetest dog in the world can still be to some extent dangerous when it is of a breed that has been bred to have a particularly damage-inflicting bite.
A Rotties and Pits are such breeds. Most of the pits I know are actually very sweet tempered, easygoing dogs. And I still don't want my child around them because they have a dangerous bite. All dogs, from teacup size ones to Wolfhounds will bite. ALL of them. No exceptions. However, some dogs, when they do bite, have devastating bite patterns. It's just not worth the risk to me.
People who say "oh, I don't have to have my dog in a fence or on a leash because he would NEVER bite anyone" are dangerously naive. Yes, he might. He's a dog, not a person. Do not do the dog a disservice by trying to anthromorphize his thought processes. Couple that with a dog that has the sort of bite pattern that can take someone's face off, and there's a problem.
And then, of course, you have the problem of people deliberately getting "dangerous" dogs because they have this stupid macho thing going on and encouraging the dog to be vicious (which is probably more accurately described as "constantly frightened"). So now we have a dangerous dog that is ALSO a vicious dog.
Comment