then there's this:
Apple's supplier code of conduct demands that employees are treated with respect and dignity, but its own audit reports suggest suppliers in China may not meet up to these standards.
hey lets set standards, use that as a marketing tool "we demand this from not only ourselves but our suppliers", and when our own audit shows they aren't holding up their end of the code, we'll just look the other way for the sake of profits.
"Apple is committed to ensuring that working conditions in our supply chain are safe, workers are treated with respect and dignity, and manufacturing processes are environmentally responsible," Apple stresses that: "It does not tolerate any violations of its supplier code of conduct."
the above is from Macworld june 2006, Apple's audit(in 2006, so five years ago) substantiated the claims that foxconn violated their supplier code of conduct and did nothing.
Apple's supplier code of conduct demands that employees are treated with respect and dignity, but its own audit reports suggest suppliers in China may not meet up to these standards.
hey lets set standards, use that as a marketing tool "we demand this from not only ourselves but our suppliers", and when our own audit shows they aren't holding up their end of the code, we'll just look the other way for the sake of profits.
"Apple is committed to ensuring that working conditions in our supply chain are safe, workers are treated with respect and dignity, and manufacturing processes are environmentally responsible," Apple stresses that: "It does not tolerate any violations of its supplier code of conduct."
the above is from Macworld june 2006, Apple's audit(in 2006, so five years ago) substantiated the claims that foxconn violated their supplier code of conduct and did nothing.
Comment