Cops can of course search your house, car, whatever with a warrant.
Without a warrant it requires a case of "Reasonable suspicion" or "probable cause"
http://www.fletc.gov/training/progra...rroll.pdf/view
A wallet on the seat may be tempting but it is NOT contraband, nor proof that evidence of a crime will be found.
The article then states that a vehicle search is not unreasonable "If based on fact that would justify the issuance of a warrant"
THAT right there is what they didn't have. They had no probable cause to enter the vehicles.
They weren't just walking about and saying, "OMG there's a bloody glove in the front seat, check it out."
They went out for the purpose of searching cars, fully INTENDING to search and open every car they could, before they even got to the area.
Without a warrant it requires a case of "Reasonable suspicion" or "probable cause"
http://www.fletc.gov/training/progra...rroll.pdf/view
Instead, the Supreme Court has found probable cause to exist “where the known facts and circumstances are sufficient to warrant a man of reasonable prudence in the belief that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.”
A wallet on the seat may be tempting but it is NOT contraband, nor proof that evidence of a crime will be found.
The article then states that a vehicle search is not unreasonable "If based on fact that would justify the issuance of a warrant"
THAT right there is what they didn't have. They had no probable cause to enter the vehicles.
They weren't just walking about and saying, "OMG there's a bloody glove in the front seat, check it out."
They went out for the purpose of searching cars, fully INTENDING to search and open every car they could, before they even got to the area.
Comment