One of the supermarkets I occasionally visit has parking spaces for the disabled clearly marked. Nice wide bays, they are, with extra borders for the amount of extra space required. It also has similar spaces marked for parents with children.
I know that in the US the law protects disabled parking spaces - park in those designated for the disabled and face towing/fines etc. Crazylegs - you may be able to impart some knowledge to us about the UK state of legal affairs in privately-owned car parks. I'm fairly sure that there are no laws requiring parking for parents with small children.
Why do I tell you this?
Well, the supermarket I occasionally visit has both, as I said, but guess which one is right next to the door and which one is further away? If you guessed that parents (with their greater need for spending large amounts of money statistically) were slap-bang by the door, you'd be right. Disabled people have to cross one of the traffic lanes to get to the door.
On a weekend away, I went with a couple of chums to another branch of the same store and parked in a 'parent' spot. One chum cheered me on, for he has yet to breed successfully. The other - a parent of at least two years - was outraged. As I said to him at the time, he's a parent (despite being without his child), and I doubt that they can do anything legally (no signs up etc), so we parked there. It's not normal behaviour for me, but I'll be damned if something as blatantly unfair as that goes without comment or action.
I'm not a parent and I'm not disabled. I see no reason, other than money, that disabled people should be considered as in lesser need than parents.
Anyone object?
Rapscallion
I know that in the US the law protects disabled parking spaces - park in those designated for the disabled and face towing/fines etc. Crazylegs - you may be able to impart some knowledge to us about the UK state of legal affairs in privately-owned car parks. I'm fairly sure that there are no laws requiring parking for parents with small children.
Why do I tell you this?
Well, the supermarket I occasionally visit has both, as I said, but guess which one is right next to the door and which one is further away? If you guessed that parents (with their greater need for spending large amounts of money statistically) were slap-bang by the door, you'd be right. Disabled people have to cross one of the traffic lanes to get to the door.
On a weekend away, I went with a couple of chums to another branch of the same store and parked in a 'parent' spot. One chum cheered me on, for he has yet to breed successfully. The other - a parent of at least two years - was outraged. As I said to him at the time, he's a parent (despite being without his child), and I doubt that they can do anything legally (no signs up etc), so we parked there. It's not normal behaviour for me, but I'll be damned if something as blatantly unfair as that goes without comment or action.
I'm not a parent and I'm not disabled. I see no reason, other than money, that disabled people should be considered as in lesser need than parents.
Anyone object?
Rapscallion
Comment