http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/ipad/w...-1226302617364
This is one of the few times I have to agree with the police. And the reason why is purely based on the comments of the woman affected. She seems to think that the road rules shouldn't apply to her because a) she was pregnant and b) she wasn't using the road as a rat run. (a "rat run" refers to a side street that people use to avoid getting stuck in peak-hour traffic.) If the sign says "No left turn between <hours> and <hours>" then it means NO LEFT TURN, not "No left turn for the non-pregnant" people.
Also, the road in question wasn't a t-intersection. If she needed to vomit so badly, she could've pulled over after the left turn. Yes I KNOW that the need to vomit is overwhelming, but last I checked, being pregnant (or chronically ill full stop) does not give you a right to violate road rules. Also, if her morning sickness was that severe, there are medications known as anti-emetics that pregnant women can take (I've had 2-3 friends with severe morning sickness who have had to rely on some anti-emetics, which haven't stopped the morning sickness completely, but have abated it)
She argues commonsense and compassion. Common sense would've dictated that she could've pulled over BEFORE or AFTER that turn-the road in question doesn't have a single yellow line going the whole way. She could've also made plans for if her morning sickness was so severe. Compassion would've maybe resulted in the fine being lowered, not dropped completely.
If she wins though, I can see this occurring for EVERYBODY who vomits while driving: "Oh sorry Officer, I didn't see the sign there, I was too hungover from last night and needed to vomit".
This is one of the few times I have to agree with the police. And the reason why is purely based on the comments of the woman affected. She seems to think that the road rules shouldn't apply to her because a) she was pregnant and b) she wasn't using the road as a rat run. (a "rat run" refers to a side street that people use to avoid getting stuck in peak-hour traffic.) If the sign says "No left turn between <hours> and <hours>" then it means NO LEFT TURN, not "No left turn for the non-pregnant" people.
Also, the road in question wasn't a t-intersection. If she needed to vomit so badly, she could've pulled over after the left turn. Yes I KNOW that the need to vomit is overwhelming, but last I checked, being pregnant (or chronically ill full stop) does not give you a right to violate road rules. Also, if her morning sickness was that severe, there are medications known as anti-emetics that pregnant women can take (I've had 2-3 friends with severe morning sickness who have had to rely on some anti-emetics, which haven't stopped the morning sickness completely, but have abated it)
She argues commonsense and compassion. Common sense would've dictated that she could've pulled over BEFORE or AFTER that turn-the road in question doesn't have a single yellow line going the whole way. She could've also made plans for if her morning sickness was so severe. Compassion would've maybe resulted in the fine being lowered, not dropped completely.
If she wins though, I can see this occurring for EVERYBODY who vomits while driving: "Oh sorry Officer, I didn't see the sign there, I was too hungover from last night and needed to vomit".
Comment