I don't think it's an obviuos choice, but I do think it's one that had a political calculation behind it. First South Carolina declaring itself against, and then Joe Biden declaring himself for... It may not be politically expedient to be for gay marriage, but it would be even less expedient to continue his "My feelings are complicated" charade.
What Obama's biggest problem at the moment is a lack of enthusiasm amongst his base. It's not that they're likely to vote for Romney as much as they're not likely to vote at all. The young people who loved him in '08 are becoming disillusioned in '12.
I'm of two minds on calling this 'courageous.' On the one hand, I do think it's good that he declared his stance. He could easily have said "No, I don't believe in gay marriage" and then changed his mind after the election. I do not, however, think that this is a situation where he just said this because it was the right thing to do and he really wanted America to know this. I don't imagine he woke up that morning and said "Today I tell them I want equality, I can't stand people not knowing." Or even "South Carolina just voted against it. I need to let the gays in the country know someone cares for them."
I suppose it's courageous that he said it. I just don't want to present that this was a sweeping political gesture. It was out of necessity that he said it now. It wasn't courageous that he said it now. That he didn't lie, however, was courageous.
Well, yeah, I assumed that was clear. It doesn't mean that black people are any more or less human than, say, Christians are. Or that as a gay guy I should declare all black people my enemy because all black people hate me. All it means is that members of that subculture are likely to be biased. Why this is I don't know, but it's silly to claim that it's not true.
Edit: It's like saying that Hip-hop music is more commonly listened to among African-Americans than among whites. That doesn't mean that African-Americans have a genetic predisposition towards it.
What Obama's biggest problem at the moment is a lack of enthusiasm amongst his base. It's not that they're likely to vote for Romney as much as they're not likely to vote at all. The young people who loved him in '08 are becoming disillusioned in '12.
I'm of two minds on calling this 'courageous.' On the one hand, I do think it's good that he declared his stance. He could easily have said "No, I don't believe in gay marriage" and then changed his mind after the election. I do not, however, think that this is a situation where he just said this because it was the right thing to do and he really wanted America to know this. I don't imagine he woke up that morning and said "Today I tell them I want equality, I can't stand people not knowing." Or even "South Carolina just voted against it. I need to let the gays in the country know someone cares for them."
I suppose it's courageous that he said it. I just don't want to present that this was a sweeping political gesture. It was out of necessity that he said it now. It wasn't courageous that he said it now. That he didn't lie, however, was courageous.
Just to be clear, I don't think that Andara's suggesting that someone's melanin content or ancestry are causing them to be bigoted. It's more likely that it is a black cultural issue, than a racial issue.
Edit: It's like saying that Hip-hop music is more commonly listened to among African-Americans than among whites. That doesn't mean that African-Americans have a genetic predisposition towards it.
Comment