Link
The man in the story was shopping for books for his grandchildren and stopped to take a phone call. He was asked to leave the store and told that men without children cannot be in the children's section.
If the man's story is accurate then I agree that this is discrimination. Fathers and grandfathers should not be banned from shopping for children's gifts because society fears men who are near children. When my husband shops for gifts for the girls he certainly doesn't take them with him. A store should not have a policy that applies to men and not women.
However, I do wonder if the issue was more to do with the fact that he was hanging out in the children's section on a cell phone. With smart phones, it is possible that someone thought that he was taking photos or videos. Still doesn't justify the "no men without children" ban, though. The employee may have just needed an excuse to get him out of there due to complaints or suspicions and chose the wrong thing to say.
Either way, I have never been a fan of suspicious behavior being used as an excuse to ban or remove anyone. I used to be terribly shy and always looked nervous in public. A few times I had store employees follow me around and badger me but I was never asked to leave. If people are concerned then they should have watched him and the children more closely until they could determine what was happening. Or, they could have just asked him.
The man in the story was shopping for books for his grandchildren and stopped to take a phone call. He was asked to leave the store and told that men without children cannot be in the children's section.
If the man's story is accurate then I agree that this is discrimination. Fathers and grandfathers should not be banned from shopping for children's gifts because society fears men who are near children. When my husband shops for gifts for the girls he certainly doesn't take them with him. A store should not have a policy that applies to men and not women.
However, I do wonder if the issue was more to do with the fact that he was hanging out in the children's section on a cell phone. With smart phones, it is possible that someone thought that he was taking photos or videos. Still doesn't justify the "no men without children" ban, though. The employee may have just needed an excuse to get him out of there due to complaints or suspicions and chose the wrong thing to say.
Either way, I have never been a fan of suspicious behavior being used as an excuse to ban or remove anyone. I used to be terribly shy and always looked nervous in public. A few times I had store employees follow me around and badger me but I was never asked to leave. If people are concerned then they should have watched him and the children more closely until they could determine what was happening. Or, they could have just asked him.
Comment