Students suspended for seeing a picture of teacher topless..

[Greenday]

She probably linked it so she could download stuff for lessons at home and then just upload it at work.

[Racket_Man]

Follow up article

http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2...t-says-no?lite

Now the school district is saying that the alledged "nude picture" was neither nude nor topless nor pornographic AND the picture was from the neck down not showing a face. It "may" have been "sexually suggestive" but not as bad as initially reported AND no CRIMINAL behavior was detected.

[fireheart17]

Follow up article

http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2...t-says-no?lite

Now the school district is saying that the alledged "nude picture" was neither nude nor topless nor pornographic AND the picture was from the neck down not showing a face. It "may" have been "sexually suggestive" but not as bad as initially reported AND no CRIMINAL behavior was detected.

Or in plain English: we've finally realised that we're a bunch of drones who can't think for ourselves and the "sentience" switch has been turned on so we CAN think for ourselves

[telecom_goddess]

talking about weird advertising I saw a commercial for Dish Sattelite on IFC. Which is a channel they dropped

[Aethian]

talking about weird advertising I saw a commercial for Dish Sattelite on IFC. Which is a channel they dropped

Ummm.... What?

[telecom_goddess]

Ummm.... What?

Yeah not DirecTV but the other one, there was a big story about them dropping IFC and yet when I was watching IFC last night they had an ad for that very company.

[Mytical]

Wait...hold up..give my brain some time to reboot. So not only did they make a monumental mistake by suspending the students..but now the photo was 'not topless (etc)'. This makes it better? HOW? I ... wait ... what? Arrgghhh my head hurts..trying to understand the crazy!

[Aethian]

Yeah not DirecTV but the other one, there was a big story about them dropping IFC and yet when I was watching IFC last night they had an ad for that very company.

I don't understand how that connects to the suspended kids and a iCloud share between the iProducts.

[Mytical]

I don't understand how that connects to the suspended kids and a iCloud share between the iProducts.

The discussion had went a little off topic to odd adds because of a mention of an add that was on the link I posted. Which led to discussing about having odd ads in odd places..thus the Directv mention.

[Greenday]

Follow up article

http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2...t-says-no?lite

Now the school district is saying that the alledged "nude picture" was neither nude nor topless nor pornographic AND the picture was from the neck down not showing a face. It "may" have been "sexually suggestive" but not as bad as initially reported AND no CRIMINAL behavior was detected.

So now it wasn't porn, but they are still suspended. This makes so much sense...

[insertNameHere]

So now it wasn't porn, but they are still suspended. This makes so much sense...

Because they were using "unauthorized applications" according to the article....

I'm sorry how fucking stupid are you to give a group of young kids and Ipad with no sort of parental controls enabled and expect them NOT to fuck around. Back when I was in 8th grade I got suspended for hacking it wasn't until my suspension was served I was keyed in on some very important things. I was using a computer I was authorized to be on and copied a file from the recycle bin which is equal to the trashcan, then posted an 8th grade yearbook poll online.... I was told I runied yearbook sales, REALLY? like it wouldn't be possible to guess winners of a popularity contest??? and thinking anyone bought a yearbook for a poll is just stupid.

If you only want them using certain programs, only have those programs installed or some form of control to prevent forbidden programs from opening, until then kids press buttons. DEAL with it. OR HOLY shit, forbid them access to the Ipad instead of telling them to go enjoy a day off. For me suspension was fucking awesome, sleeping in and watching TV all day going for a good lunch with my mom since she supported my shenanigans I got slapped and due to zero tolerance would have been suspended for blocking so I knocked his ass down and grabbed a chair.

[fireheart17]

Because they were using "unauthorized applications" according to the article....

I'm sorry how fucking stupid are you to give a group of young kids and Ipad with no sort of parental controls enabled and expect them NOT to fuck around.

Exactly. Or no internet restrictions. Even the fucking wireless at my high school prevented me from accessing porn!

[DGoddess]

So, there are photos of their teacher's boobs out in the open and they totally expected 13 year old boys not to look?

LOL GTFO

I'm still scratching my head on this one . . .OF COURSE a 13 year old boy is going to look - it's not exactly rocket science. That's nature.

That said, what I can't understand about the children's suspension for looking at these pics - I mean, how would they have known otherwise that the inappropriate photos were there if they had not seen them????


I don't think I've heard if the teacher whose pictures were involved received any type of disciplinary action . . . which is another reason why it makes this story all the more outrageous.

I wonder about the future of mankind when they start using logic like this: let's punish the kids for looking at naked pics but not the person who appears naked???

And I guarantee you more than one school official had to have taken another private peek at those pics when nobody was looking.

[Mytical]

<snip>
I wonder about the future of mankind when they start using logic like this: let's punish the kids for looking at naked pics but not the person who appears naked???

But wait..it gets worse. If the school is to be believed the pictures were not of somebody naked/topless/etc. Which somehow makes the suspension better/more logical. Not sure on what planet it would be better/more logical..but I guess that is beside the point????