If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
This is actually the exact opposite of a waste of time.
This is a very important case regarding the protection given for "fair use" and can set an important precedent against copyright holders misusing the take-down process to stifle the speech of others.
As much as I like his music, Prince is an ass, and the music industry needs to unclench quite a bit.
^-.-^
Faith is about what you do. It's about aspiring to be better and nobler and kinder than you are. It's about making sacrifices for the good of others. - Dresden
Prince? You mean "The Artist Formerly Known as Popular."
--- I want the republicans out of my bedroom, the democrats out of my wallet, and both out of my first and second amendment rights. Whether you are part of the anal-retentive overly politically-correct left, or the bible-thumping bellowing right, get out of the thought control business --- Alan Nathan
Prince absolutely is an uptight asshole. He's so far up himself that he refused to let Yankovic parody him.
I'm not sure why this is a waste of the mother's time, especially if she's awarded damages from their action being declared beyond their legal bounds.
^-.-^
Faith is about what you do. It's about aspiring to be better and nobler and kinder than you are. It's about making sacrifices for the good of others. - Dresden
am i the only one who is worried if she loses? is she does it sets a hell of a bad precedent, and opens up the door to have tons of videos pulled down because of accidental background music #5..
All uses of You, You're, and etc are generic unless specified otherwise.
What irks me about this case is what "Damages" was she subjected to? Was she making money off of this video? Was she hoping to make money off of this video?
She posted a video and it got scrubbed. What "damage" was done that justifies a monetary payout?
Some People Are Alive Only Because It's Illegal To Kill Them.
What irks me about this case is what "Damages" was she subjected to? Was she making money off of this video? Was she hoping to make money off of this video?
She posted a video and it got scrubbed. What "damage" was done that justifies a monetary payout?
Pain and suffering.
You know, because the emotional trauma of having your precious YouTube video entitles you to a cash payout.
I can't believe Prince objected to what appears to be a 30 second video of cute kids dancing to his music.. I would think he'd appreciate the free reminder of how fun his music used to be. Plus she wasn't making any money off it that I am aware of, what a joke!
You're Perfect Yes It's True.. But Without Me You're Only You!
Comment