Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Misuse of funds

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Misuse of funds

    This is a story of a woman who got the government to pay for a boob job, so she could be a model. Thing is she doesn't have the face to be a model, and the way she does her make up is unfortunate.

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...NHS-boobs.html

  • #2
    Methinks the line of modeling she is going into needs very little attention paid to the face, she want's to be the next Katie Price (aka Jordan) so that means she's eyeing up Soho and Spearmint Rhino when she says 'London lifestyle'.

    Next she needs to work on that gag refliex of hers, the punters have to hope for low lighting, yet I feel that make up will show up like UV paint it's that garish.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hmm... I'm quite sure I saw that same face at 11am once when my roommate woke up from a wild party. Took about 3 days for the sharpie to fully wash off his face.

      EDIT: I just realized that this article is from The Sun. Is that really the most reliable source for this story?
      Last edited by TheHuckster; 03-27-2013, 11:03 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        The Sun get's first dibbs on any story relating to boobs, then it's the Star, the Sport which has a Page 3 girl every odd page only want's celeb boobs not wanna be celebs.

        Comment


        • #5
          Her face looks OK to me, adjusting for the distorting angle and bad makeup. Boobs are a bit too much.
          "My in-laws are country people and at night you can hear their distinctive howl."

          Comment


          • #6
            I say she's got a ugly just because she just doesn't know how to smile. What the hell is she doing with her mouth? What's with her arm positioning?

            Maybe if she had a calm, passive expression I could see that she looks okay... but until then... yeesh.

            ALSO;

            I HAVE A CUPS. I am quite proud of them. I wear bathing suits, bikinis, and other things that accent my particular shape. (I have a narrow hour-glass figure, so not super curvacious, but still a sharp curve at the waist.)

            You don't have to have big boobs to look awesome. You just need to know what kinds of clothing - what cut, what color, what style - to put on to accent what you have.

            My boyfriend's opinion on the matter? "Anything more than a handful is a waste anyway."

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by AmbrosiaWriter View Post
              You don't have to have big boobs to look awesome. You just need to know what kinds of clothing - what cut, what color, what style - to put on to accent what you have.

              My boyfriend's opinion on the matter? "Anything more than a handful is a waste anyway."
              As a male, I totally agree. I appreciate boobs, and am attracted to them, but their size rarely matters. What matters to me is proper proportions. If you are curvy, then larger boobs do look better, but if you're petite, then smaller boobs are perfectly fine, and I'm attracted to both body types.

              This might sound anti-stereotypical for a male, but for me the face trumps everything. An attractive face usually trumps any other flaw, and I can lose all interest in a hot body if there isn't a pretty face to match.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by TheHuckster View Post

                This might sound anti-stereotypical for a male, but for me the face trumps everything. An attractive face usually trumps any other flaw, and I can lose all interest in a hot body if there isn't a pretty face to match.
                Id like to add intelligence and a good personality.

                I actually think the grainy picture of her looks better.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bara View Post
                  Id like to add intelligence and a good personality.

                  I actually think the grainy picture of her looks better.
                  Indeed on the personality. Intelligence is good, but not THAT great, while a personality is more important to me than looks.

                  And yeah, that grainy picture looks WAY better.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Akasa View Post
                    This is a story of a woman who got the government to pay for a boob job, so she could be a model. Thing is she doesn't have the face to be a model, and the way she does her make up is unfortunate.
                    I am unaware of any models that have stretch marks.
                    Registered rider scenic shore 150 charity ride

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I can see calling this kind of thing a work expense if you are already an established model or an actress or whatever. To say it's necessary because it could potentially help you is ridiculous. I could have wings surgically grafted on because they could potentially help me fly...

                      As for boobs, I like a nice rack as much as the next girl but large breasts alone are not going to be attractive. It's the whole package, starting with some self-confidence...which this poor woman doesn't seem to have.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        As she is going in for 'Glamour modeling', in the UK that means either page 3/soft-medium core mags (not sure if we allow hard mags in the UK sex shops), big tits are an asset, not sure what the small boob niche is vs jugs, but I'm guessing more work.

                        That and she want's to be the next Jordan, this has nothing to do with confidance or catwalk / catalogue modeling.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          In that grainy photo, she looks pretty cute, and her chest size matches the toned body. In the big shot-- well, I wouldn't say she looks ugly. I'd say she looks fake. Bad lipstick color, too-puffed eyelashes, eyebrows that look like Japanese sumi-e brushstrokes, fake-looking dark hair, and her chest is WAY too big. Just my opinions.

                          TheHuckster: I, too, look at face first as far as looks go. But everything should be complimentary. And with her current look, nothing is.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            personally i think it's just the makeup.

                            although, keep in mind there's a market for pretty much everything when it comes to modeling.

                            the real qualifications in my opinion are, knowing how to market what you have, networking, and being able to play up/down features (although this can also fall under networking, assuming you know how to get a good photographer & MUA etc).

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by BlaqueKatt View Post
                              I am unaware of any models that have stretch marks.
                              The answer to that is simple: photoshop. If they aren't doing catwalk modelling, then they would most likely be photoshopping those stretch marks away.

                              Otherwise, it'd be a ton of coverup.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X