Originally posted by telecom_goddess
View Post
Many people believe that poly marriages are "exploitative". That's the main crux of what I understand the "problem" to be. That, and things like the tax code aren't really set up for it.
But honestly, I was focusing on "two" being the number because poly I think could be a separate discussion, and conflate things.
Though you do make a valid point about "why not three"? Though I guess some would start a "slippery slope" argument (as in, why not 4 or 5 or 6, etc.).
I'm not really liberal (most on this forum know that), I'm just asking the questions.
Comment