Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The English Language is Literally Dead

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The English Language is Literally Dead

    ...because according to Merriam-Webster the definition of Literally now include "figuratively."

    The article

    Merriam-Webster Definition

    Definition on Dictionary.com

    Originally posted by When Googling "Literally"
    lit·er·al·ly
    /ˈlitərəlē/
    Adverb
    1) In a literal manner or sense; exactly: "the driver took it literally when asked to go straight over the traffic circle".
    2) Used to acknowledge that something is not literally true but is used for emphasis or to express strong feeling.
    Synonyms
    literatim - word for word - verbatim - to the letter

    Now if you will all excuse me, I am going to go be sad. I mean, adding selfie to the dictionary is one thing, but to make the definition of a word it's antonym because people can't use the word properly is just foolish!

    I literally feel sick! (Can you guess which definition I'm using?)

  • #2
    The English languageis literally dead as a consequence of it being a living language. How ironic.

    Now that the usage is technically correct, I have less of a problem with it.
    "So, my little Zillians... Have your fun, as long as I let you have fun... but don't forget who is the boss!"
    We are contented, because he says we are
    He really meant it when he says we've come so far

    Comment


    • #3
      It joins "cleave," then?
      "My in-laws are country people and at night you can hear their distinctive howl."

      Comment


      • #4
        Honestly, I think the whole thing went down the drains when literally stopped meaning 'According to the exact letters.'

        I doubt that the Detroit Lions lost literally every game of their 2009 season. You can't do that very easily with a direct quotation.
        "Nam castum esse decet pium poetam
        ipsum, versiculos nihil necessest"

        Comment


        • #5
          I heard about this last week on Radio Dead Air WTFIWWY live, but it was half 4 in the morning where I am by the time the show starts so I wasn't in the best of my capabilities to write up a response and forgot about it till the VOD was put on blip.

          To me, Merriam-Webster have been trying to kill the English language since gaining independence, I'm not sure which of the two was the publisher and which was presumably one of the founding fathers (as it's not my country only a few names are of any note from that era) but the FF one was iir really keen for English to not be the language of America, makes me wonder what the world would be like if they adopted French or German instead.

          Comment


          • #6
            Dictionaries follow usage, not the other way around. They don't establish new words and new uses, they record them. Dictionaries don't tell us what usages are "allowed," only what was recognized by that publisher at the time that dictionary was published. Some dictionaries recognize slang; some don't. For a dictionary that recognizes slang usages of words, it makes complete sense for them to add the facetious definition of "literally." It's in common usage, therefore it gets added.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Hyena Dandy View Post
              Honestly, I think the whole thing went down the drains when literally stopped meaning 'According to the exact letters.'

              I doubt that the Detroit Lions lost literally every game of their 2009 season. You can't do that very easily with a direct quotation.
              Why did you have to go there? They were 4-0 in the pre-season...so they didn't lose every game...

              Comment

              Working...
              X