Well Mysty, those people deserve a swat to the head. I wouldn't raise an eyebrow at someone with triplets- they happen often enough. (well I might raise an eyebrow, but not in a condescending way! I'd just be intensely curious about the little cuties)
I have met multiple mothers of twins and triplets. Hell, I've met a good number of huge families in my time (I worked in a photo studio for a couple of years, in an area with a large Hasidic population- in their religious culture large families are encouraged. And I've met many families with 5 or even 11 children!)
While I personally don't want or necessarily agree with people having that many kids, in my mind it's none of my business as long as the children are healthy and the whole family unit is well cared/provided for (and not solely on my dime).
My problem with this situation is this woman's BALLS to use IVF as a means of reproduction when she clearly hasn't got the means to support her children.
I'm sorry. If you can't support yourself and/or any existing children, the last thing you should be doing is getting implanted with are more potential kids. Especially aiming for multiples.
Oopsies happen in nature. But if you're incapable of having children, AND are on public support ALREADY you shouldn't be seeking outside methods of fertility. Even if you are naturally fruitful, you should be responsible and try to prevent pregnancy if you're already on public assistance- nothing is 100% failproof, though- so in that case I might be sympathetic.
Sorry I think I rambled.
I see your point Mysty, and it is a shame that people can't reserve their thoughts, anger, or whatever to the one person who deserves it- Nadya Suleman.
I have met multiple mothers of twins and triplets. Hell, I've met a good number of huge families in my time (I worked in a photo studio for a couple of years, in an area with a large Hasidic population- in their religious culture large families are encouraged. And I've met many families with 5 or even 11 children!)
While I personally don't want or necessarily agree with people having that many kids, in my mind it's none of my business as long as the children are healthy and the whole family unit is well cared/provided for (and not solely on my dime).
My problem with this situation is this woman's BALLS to use IVF as a means of reproduction when she clearly hasn't got the means to support her children.
I'm sorry. If you can't support yourself and/or any existing children, the last thing you should be doing is getting implanted with are more potential kids. Especially aiming for multiples.
Oopsies happen in nature. But if you're incapable of having children, AND are on public support ALREADY you shouldn't be seeking outside methods of fertility. Even if you are naturally fruitful, you should be responsible and try to prevent pregnancy if you're already on public assistance- nothing is 100% failproof, though- so in that case I might be sympathetic.
Sorry I think I rambled.
I see your point Mysty, and it is a shame that people can't reserve their thoughts, anger, or whatever to the one person who deserves it- Nadya Suleman.
Comment