So I guess Chicago has seen a rise in violent crime these past several years. It's gotten so bad that the city has been nicknamed "Chiraq". So there's been a community effort... to try to retire the name "Chiraq".
I can see their logic. Combat the negative stigma associated with the city and hope that shootings will not be so expected. It's better than nothing, I guess, but it is a long shot. This seems like a localized Ban Bossy. A campaign that only targets one word in hopes of combating a problem much more complex than a single slur (though granted, this problem is a lot more serious than what BanBossy was fighting).
On the same topic, is Chicago really that bad? I've been downtown a year ago and thought it was pretty nice. Is it just some of the surrounding neighborhoods that have gotten bad? (that's the problem with Detroit, though downtown Detroit is nothing to brag about).
I can see their logic. Combat the negative stigma associated with the city and hope that shootings will not be so expected. It's better than nothing, I guess, but it is a long shot. This seems like a localized Ban Bossy. A campaign that only targets one word in hopes of combating a problem much more complex than a single slur (though granted, this problem is a lot more serious than what BanBossy was fighting).
On the same topic, is Chicago really that bad? I've been downtown a year ago and thought it was pretty nice. Is it just some of the surrounding neighborhoods that have gotten bad? (that's the problem with Detroit, though downtown Detroit is nothing to brag about).
Comment