Originally posted by TheHuckster
View Post
what I mean by used too aggressively is that situations that shouldn't really come under a zero-tolerance policy at all- like kids playing with finger guns, or I remember there being a case of a candy (IIRC) being chewed into the shape of a gun- being classed under the same zero-tolerance p0olicy as bringing an actual gun into school. That is more a fault in implementing a zero-tolerance policy than an issue with the policy itself. oh, and by not having enough flexibility, what i mean is that they usually treat everything exactly the same. what's wrong with requiring a punishment, but for minor cases, the punishment being minor? ( what I mean, for example, is if someone brings in a toy gun, then take it off them ( give it back at the end of the day for them to take home) asnd tell them not to bring it in again.)
Comment