Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comparing homosexuality to vegetarianism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comparing homosexuality to vegetarianism

    Someone at work said the reason he doesn't agree with homosexuality is the same reason he doesn't agree with vegetarianism.

    He said because we have teeth to chew meat with that we are meant to chew meat. And because boy parts are made to match girl parts that is how it should be.

    Apparently he doesn't understand that while vegetarianism is a choice my being gay is not.
    Jack Faire
    Friend
    Father
    Smartass

  • #2
    Originally posted by jackfaire View Post
    He said because we have teeth to chew meat with that we are meant to chew meat.


    I'd be sorely tempted to give this guy a carrot and see how he eats it without using his teeth.

    You need teeth to be a vegetarian, too.

    Comment


    • #3
      Oh great. Another "homosexuality is unnatural!" loonatic.

      Well you know what else is unnatural?

      Cellhphones.

      Indoor pumbing.

      Organ transplants.

      Those things are unnatural. We invented them as humans. Are they bad? How many people in the modern world would just die if they went a day without their cellphones?

      So you know what? I don't wanna hear this "homosexuality goes against nature!" bullshit. You're "going against nature" every time you take an OVC painkiller, so shut the hell up.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Crescent Cat View Post
        So you know what? I don't wanna hear this "homosexuality goes against nature!" bullshit. You're "going against nature" every time you take an OVC painkiller, so shut the hell up.
        But, I can see the argument there. Think about it, "Tab A" was originally designed to fit into "Slot B." But, not every Tab *wants* to fit into a Slot, or is even attracted to Slots in the first place

        Comment


        • #5
          Okay, you may be right there.

          My whole point is that it doesn't matter whether it "goes against nature" or not. That doesn't make it a bad thing. It's not harming anyone so who the hell cares if it's natural?

          We can debate about whether or not homosexuality is a choice or not until the end of time, but as far as I'm concerned it doesn't hurt anyone so who cares if it's a choice or not?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by jackfaire View Post
            Someone at work said the reason he doesn't agree with homosexuality is the same reason he doesn't agree with vegetarianism.

            He said because we have teeth to chew meat with that we are meant to chew meat. And because boy parts are made to match girl parts that is how it should be.
            So only STRAIGHT people, um... eat meat?
            "My in-laws are country people and at night you can hear their distinctive howl."

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by HYHYBT View Post
              So only STRAIGHT people, um... eat meat?
              roflmao I so wish I had said that
              Jack Faire
              Friend
              Father
              Smartass

              Comment


              • #8
                Our "boy parts" are also used to urinate and generate testosterone and other male sex hormones. So I guess gay men's "boy parts" are still used after all. This guy is only looking at part of the picture.


                Also, if anyone uses the "it's not natural" argument, ask them to put their money where their mouth is. Ask them to get rid of their central heating and air conditioning, their eyeglasses, their contact lenses, their iPod, their computer, their refrigerator, etc. Heck, ask them to resort to living in little hunter-gatherer groups with barely any clothes, where all of their food is scavenged for or hunted, and where most people live 20-30 years tops. If nature had it's way, that's how we'd be living.
                Last edited by guywithashovel; 02-05-2010, 06:50 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by jackfaire View Post
                  He said because we have teeth to chew meat with that we are meant to chew meat. And because boy parts are made to match girl parts that is how it should be.
                  So many quotes could come of the 'made to match' part...
                  foot with butt, fist to face, rubber fowl to his jowl, and you know... potatoes surprisingly fit snugly into a car's exhaust pipe, but I don't think those things are necessarily *meant* to go there... Hmmmmm.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Baseball Bat, to his back. .45 slug, through his lung!

                    The last one rhymes if you work a little at it

                    I still don't get the whole 'unnatural' thing. I mean, where do you draw the line? Are anthills unnatural because ants made them instead of finding them? or beaver dams?

                    There's just no really logical place to draw the line... so don't. It'll save us a lot of time...
                    All units: IRENE
                    HK MP5-N: Solving 800 problems a minute since 1986

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Boozy View Post


                      I'd be sorely tempted to give this guy a carrot and see how he eats it without using his teeth.

                      You need teeth to be a vegetarian, too.
                      I would hazard a guess he was refering to canines rather than incisors or molars.


                      Originally posted by protege View Post
                      But, I can see the argument there. Think about it, "Tab A" was originally designed to fit into "Slot B." But, not every Tab *wants* to fit into a Slot, or is even attracted to Slots in the first place
                      Tab A into slot B was poorly designed for procreation given how hit and miss it is.
                      I am a sexy shoeless god of war!
                      Minus the sexy and I'm wearing shoes.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Nyoibo View Post
                        Tab A into slot B was poorly designed for procreation given how hit and miss it is.
                        Given how some other animals reproduce*, or some of their mating habits**, I'll take the human way any given day.

                        *Deep sea male fish that melt(?) into their female mates; other fishes that just attach to their mates for life; amphibians are odd; actually, most fish and water related animals are pretty weird come to think of it.

                        ** Praying mantises and some spiders that may or may not eat their mate after sex.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Wingates_Hellsing View Post

                          I still don't get the whole 'unnatural' thing. I mean, where do you draw the line? Are anthills unnatural because ants made them instead of finding them? or beaver dams?
                          but you see, their invisible sky friend never told them anything about anthills or beaver's dams.
                          He did however put in a few words about homosexuality.
                          "I'm Gar and I'm proud" -slytovhand

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by smileyeagle1021 View Post
                            but you see, their invisible sky friend never told them anything about anthills or beaver's dams.
                            He did however put in a few words about homosexuality.
                            Sounds like their invisible sky dude's kinda assholish, or at least the people he gives his seal of approval do... subordination of assholishness
                            All units: IRENE
                            HK MP5-N: Solving 800 problems a minute since 1986

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              As for me, I've always wondered why God talks to those who've been wandering around in the desert for umpteen amount of days... and the only witness is the person who might be suffering from heat exhaustion and/or severe dehydration.

                              Or why God talks to people who people who seem perfectly capable of building multi-million dollar empires without His help... Then those people turn around and ask people to send their money to him.

                              And why is an 'invisible sky friend' the only kind of 'invisible friend' you're allowed to have? Anyone else, above a certain age, is usually locked up for being delusional.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X